215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10146700)
1. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output in CAPD patients.
Ng HW; Walleyl TJ; Tsao Y; Fahal IH; Ahmad R; Breckenridge AM
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1995; 17(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7623522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac index and ejection fraction in ischemic heart disease. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance, thermodilution and cineventriculography].
Talarico G; Saino A; Lotto A
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1992 Jun; 40(6):203-9. PubMed ID: 1407614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Determination of cardiac output by thoracic electric impedance: comparison with thermodilution].
Delfino M; Carlone S; Angelici E; Zona C; Del Bolgia F; Nigri A; Serra P; Reale A
G Ital Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 14(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6714547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Bhandopadhyaya A; Sathyaprabha TN; Janaki P; Mahalla BK; Gupta R; Banakal S; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 20229061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output in hemodialysis patients by task force monitor: a comparison with the Transonic System.
Kitzler TM; Sergeyeva O; Morris A; Skrabal F; Kotanko P; Levin NW
ASAIO J; 2007; 53(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 17885328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of injectate volume on thermodilution measurements of cardiac output in patients with low ventricular ejection fraction.
McCloy K; Leung S; Belden J; Castenada J; Erickson V; Koch K; Livingston N; Moughrabis S; Gawlinski A
Am J Crit Care; 1999 Mar; 8(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 10071698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.
Spiess BD; Patel MA; Soltow LO; Wright IH
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 11687996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.
Jewkes C; Sear JW; Verhoeff F; Sanders DJ; Foëx P
Br J Anaesth; 1991 Dec; 67(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 1768552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The non-invasive assessment of stroke volume and cardiac output by impedance cardiography: a review.
Newman DG; Callister R
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Aug; 70(8):780-9. PubMed ID: 10447052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
