325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10147039)
1. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals.
Henry D
Pharmacoeconomics; 1992 Jan; 1(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 10147039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are cancer drugs less likely to be recommended for listing by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee in Australia?
Chim L; Kelly PJ; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 20465315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it all about price? Why requests for government subsidy of anticancer drugs were rejected in Australia.
Karikios DJ; Chim L; Martin A; Nagrial A; Howard K; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
Intern Med J; 2017 Apr; 47(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 27928875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: a review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002-4.
Scuffham PA; Whitty JA; Mitchell A; Viney R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 18370565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Costs of paying higher prices for equivalent effects on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Karnon J; Edney L; Sorich M
Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26954612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
Lopert R
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996).
George B; Harris A; Mitchell A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1103-9. PubMed ID: 11735677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Key considerations in reimbursement decision-making for multiple sclerosis drugs in Australia.
Phan YHL; De Abreu Lourenco R; Haas M; van der Linden N
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():144-149. PubMed ID: 30077086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and implications for paediatric prescribing.
Sinha Y; Brien JA; Craig JC
J Paediatr Child Health; 2009 Jun; 45(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 19490409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA.
Turkstra E; Bettington E; Donohue ML; Mervin MC
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(4):521-528. PubMed ID: 28703092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.
Robertson J; Walkom EJ; Bevan MD; Newby DA
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():489. PubMed ID: 23687910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
Mauskopf JA; Sullivan SD; Annemans L; Caro J; Mullins CD; Nuijten M; Orlewska E; Watkins J; Trueman P
Value Health; 2007; 10(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 17888098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Australians able to access new medicines on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a more or less timely manner? An analysis of pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee recommendations, 1999-2003.
Wonder MJ; Neville AM; Parsons R
Value Health; 2006; 9(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 16903989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004.
Harris AH; Hill SR; Chin G; Li JJ; Walkom E
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):713-22. PubMed ID: 18378939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delays in access to affordable medicines: putting policy into perspective.
Pearce A; van Gool K; Haywood P; Haas M
Aust Health Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 23062753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
Lexchin J; Mintzes B
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective.
Drummond M; Rutten F; Brenna A; Pinto CG; Horisberger B; Jönsson B; Le Pen C; Rovira J; von der Schulenburg MG; Sintonen H
Pharmacoeconomics; 1993 Sep; 4(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 10146921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products: a draft document for Ontario and Canada.
Detsky AS
Pharmacoeconomics; 1993 May; 3(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 10146886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of pharmacoeconomic guidelines for formulary approval: the Australian experience.
Langley PC
Clin Ther; 1993; 15(6):1154-76; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 8111812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
