BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10147039)

  • 21. Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made.
    PausJenssen AM; Singer PA; Detsky AS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 12600223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Drug prices and value for money: the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
    Henry DA; Hill SR; Harris A
    JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(20):2630-2. PubMed ID: 16304078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Australian economic evaluation and government decisions on pharmaceuticals, compared to assessment of other health technologies.
    Hailey D
    Soc Sci Med; 1997 Aug; 45(4):563-81. PubMed ID: 9226782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry.
    Owen A; Spinks J; Meehan A; Robb T; Hardy M; Kwasha D; Wlodarczyk J; Reid C
    J Med Econ; 2008; 11(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 19450082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost effectiveness analyses: issues and recommendations: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part I.
    Hay JW; Smeeding J; Carroll NV; Drummond M; Garrison LP; Mansley EC; Mullins CD; Mycka JM; Seal B; Shi L
    Value Health; 2010; 13(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 19874571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The subsidy of pharmaceuticals in Australia: processes and challenges.
    Sansom L
    Aust Health Rev; 2004 Nov; 28(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 15527399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Will the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement undermine the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme?
    Harvey KJ; Faunce TA; Lokuge B; Drahos P
    Med J Aust; 2004 Sep; 181(5):256-9. PubMed ID: 15347273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Future European health care: cost containment, health care reform and scientific progress in drug research.
    Emilien G
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 1997; 12(2):81-101. PubMed ID: 10173136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.
    Anis AH; Rahman T; Schechter MT
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Jan; 13(1 Pt 2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10176146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Generic drug prices and policy in Australia: room for improvement? a comparative analysis with England.
    Mansfield SJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2014 Feb; 38(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 24480618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Australian guidelines for cost-effectiveness studies of pharmaceuticals: the thin end of the boomerang?
    Drummond M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1992; 1(Suppl 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 10146934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of the Quality of the Clinical Evidence in Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Fit for Purpose?
    Wonder M; Dunlop S
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 26091601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Governments Need Better Guidance to Maximise Value for Money: The Case of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.
    Carter D; Vogan A; Haji Ali Afzali H
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 26818196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Paying for costly pharmaceuticals: regulation of new drugs in Australia, England and New Zealand.
    Raftery JP
    Med J Aust; 2008 Jan; 188(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 18205559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Support for trials of promising medications through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. A proposal for a new authority category.
    Glasziou PP
    Med J Aust; 1995 Jan; 162(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 7605432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of PBAC submissions and outcomes for medicines (2010-2018).
    Lybrand S; Wonder M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Jun; 36(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 32524923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early benefit assessment for pharmaceuticals in Germany: lessons for policymakers.
    Schlette S; Hess R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2013 Oct; 29():1-9. PubMed ID: 24171232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A cost-effectiveness approach to drug subsidy and pricing in Australia.
    Birkett DJ; Mitchell AS; McManus P
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2001; 20(3):104-14. PubMed ID: 11585158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health Technology Assessment in Australia: The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and Medical Services Advisory Committee.
    Kim H; Byrnes J; Goodall S;
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():6-11. PubMed ID: 33429153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Australian managed entry scheme: a new manageable process for the reimbursement of new medicines?
    Wonder M; Backhouse ME; Sullivan SD
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):586-90. PubMed ID: 22583471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.