These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ J Biomech; 1990; 23(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 2229097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces. Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ J Biomech; 1993 Nov; 26(11):1271-81. PubMed ID: 8262989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement-bone interface in Tharies hip replacements. Mai MT; Schmalzried TP; Dorey FJ; Campbell PA; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Apr; 78(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 8609129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip. Finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Huiskes R; Strens PH; van Heck J; Slooff TJ Acta Orthop Scand; 1985 Dec; 56(6):474-8. PubMed ID: 4090948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probability of mechanical loosening of the femoral component in high flexion total knee arthroplasty can be reduced by rather simple surgical techniques. van de Groes S; de Waal-Malefijt M; Verdonschot N Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23731496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. Schneider E; Eulenberger J; Steiner W; Wyder D; Friedman RJ; Perren SM J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):735-44. PubMed ID: 2808455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis]. Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Topological optimization in hip prosthesis design. Fraldi M; Esposito L; Perrella G; Cutolo A; Cowin SC Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Aug; 9(4):389-402. PubMed ID: 20037769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods. Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiologic aspects of the loosening of cemented hip prostheses: mechanical, septic or granulomatous etiology?]. Malghem J; Mosseray A; Vande Berg B; Lebon C; Maldague B J Belge Radiol; 1997 Aug; 80(4):173-84. PubMed ID: 9410868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties of human bone-implant interface tissue in aseptically loose hip implants. Kraaij G; Zadpoor AA; Tuijthof GJ; Dankelman J; Nelissen RG; Valstar ER J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Oct; 38():59-68. PubMed ID: 25023868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cellular reactions in hip prosthesis loosening. Pizzoferrato A; Stea S; Ciapetti G; Cenni E; Tarabusi C; Toni A Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 1297568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a finite element model study. Grosland N; Kim JK; Park JB Biomed Mater Eng; 1995; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7773144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Schmalzried TP; Kwong LM; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Haire TC; O'Connor DO; Bragdon CR; Kabo JM; Malcolm AJ; Harris WH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):60-78. PubMed ID: 1729024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Pal B; Gupta S; New AM Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cellular basis for failure of joint prosthesis. Mohanty M Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 8922262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]