97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10147560)
1. Clinical trials and quality control: checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology.
Kohn JG; Mortola P; LeBlanc M
Assist Technol; 1991; 3(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 10147560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: results of a prospective monitoring program.
Kohn JG; LeBlanc M; Mortola P
Assist Technol; 1994; 6(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 10150738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment?
DeRuyter F
Assist Technol; 1995; 7(1):3-8; discussion 9-16. PubMed ID: 10150748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and assistive technology service provision.
Peterson DB; Murray GC
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2006; 1(1-2):59-67. PubMed ID: 19256168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optimizing provision of assistive technology. Expert opinion of the German Society for Rehabilitation, DVfR, on current issues in the provision of technical aids and assistive devices].
German Society for Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Jun; 46(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 17582558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST).
Demers L; Weiss-Lambrou R; Ska B
Assist Technol; 2000; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 11508406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a team-based method for assuring the quality of assistive technology documentation.
Desideri L; Ioele FM; Roentgen U; Gelderblom GJ; De Witte L
Assist Technol; 2014; 26(4):175-83; quiz 184-5. PubMed ID: 25771602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences.
Ripat J; Booth A
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 27(24):1461-70. PubMed ID: 16421071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation.
Howard J; Tasker LH; Fisher Z; Tree J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jan; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 35426354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. KWAZO, a new instrument to assess the quality of service delivery in assistive technology provision.
Dijcks BP; Wessels RD; de Vlieger SL; Post MW
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 28(15):909-14. PubMed ID: 16861198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment.
Federici S; Borsci S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 24936571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management.
Elsaesser LJ; Bauer SM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(5):386-401. PubMed ID: 21345000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes.
Lenker JA; Harris F; Taugher M; Smith RO
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Sep; 8(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 23350880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demonstrating a model approach to independent living center-based assistive technology services.
Nosek MA; Krouskop TA
Assist Technol; 1995; 7(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 10150750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating medical, assistive, and universal design products and technologies: Assistive Technology Service Method (ATSM).
Elsaesser LJ; Bauer S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 22188388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: an integration of quantitative and qualitative methods.
Scherer MJ; Lane JP
Disabil Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 19(12):528-35. PubMed ID: 9442991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case.
Rios A; Miguel Cruz A; GuarÃn MR; Caycedo Villarraga PS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Sep; 9(5):432-44. PubMed ID: 25007129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors.
Scherer MJ; Sax C; Vanbiervliet A; Cushman LA; Scherer JV
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 27(21):1321-31. PubMed ID: 16298935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
