These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups. Foley DP; Melkert R; Umans VA; de Jaegere PP; Strikwerda S; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW Eur Heart J; 1995 Oct; 16(10):1331-46. PubMed ID: 8746901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are residual stenoses after excimer laser angioplasty and coronary atherectomy due to inefficient or small devices? Comparison with balloon angioplasty. Safian RD; Freed M; Lichtenberg A; May MA; Juran N; Grines CL; O'Neill WW J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Nov; 22(6):1628-34. PubMed ID: 8227830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. I: history and development. Grech ED BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7398):1080-2. PubMed ID: 12750213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Percutaneous coronary intervention: Current status of the development of new devices and the perspective of their future]. Kosuga K; Tamai H Nihon Rinsho; 2003 Apr; 61 Suppl 4():529-33. PubMed ID: 12735028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New devices enhance hospital results of coronary angioplasty. Lindsay J; Pinnow EE; Pichard AD Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jan; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9473177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Role of atherectomy devices in interventional cardiology]. Dill T; Vom Dahl J Herz; 2002 Sep; 27(6):502-7. PubMed ID: 12378394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative angiographic quantitative analysis of the immediate efficacy of coronary atherectomy with balloon angioplasty, stenting, and rotational ablation. Umans VA; Strauss BH; Rensing BJ; de Jaegere P; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW Am Heart J; 1991 Sep; 122(3 Pt 1):836-43. PubMed ID: 1877459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The AHA/ACC task force criteria: what is its value in the device era? American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. Zaacks SM; Klein LW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jan; 43(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 9473179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New technologies for the treatment of obstructive arterial disease. Fischell TA; Stadius ML Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Mar; 22(3):205-33. PubMed ID: 2013086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differential interventional therapy of coronary heart disease]. Heintzen MP; Michel CJ; Strauer BE Z Kardiol; 1998; 87 Suppl 2():157-65. PubMed ID: 9827475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolving trends in interventional device use and outcomes: results from the National Cardiovascular Network Database. Peterson ED; Lansky AJ; Anstrom KJ; Muhlbaier LH; Popma JJ; Satler LF; Lanzilotta MJ Am Heart J; 2000 Feb; 139(2 Pt 1):198-207. PubMed ID: 10650291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The place of rotablator for treatment of in-stent restenosis. Reith S; Radke PW; Volk O; vom Dahl J; Klues HG Semin Interv Cardiol; 2000 Dec; 5(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 11244517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atherectomy (directional, rotational, extractional) and its role in percutaneous revascularization. Kaufmann UP; Meyer BJ Curr Opin Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 10(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 7549084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating new devices. Acute (in-hospital) results from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention Registry. Baim DS; Kent KM; King SB; Safian RD; Cowley MJ; Holmes DR; Roubin GS; Gallup D; Steenkiste AR; Detre K Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):471-81. PubMed ID: 8281682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Options for percutaneous coronary and peripheral revascularization. White CJ; Ramee SR Med Clin North Am; 1992 Sep; 76(5):1099-124. PubMed ID: 1518328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]