134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148066)
1. Suddenly, urology takes up the laparoscope.
Winfield HN
Contemp Urol; 1991 Jan; 3(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 10148066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of laparoscopy in urologic surgery.
Stroumbakis N; Hernández-Graulau JM
Semin Urol; 1992 Aug; 10(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 1387966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Laparoscopy: new technique in urology].
Janssen T; Schulman C
Rev Med Brux; 1994; 15(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 7984850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Laparoscopic boundaries between urology and visceral surgery].
Rassweiler JJ; Brune I; Saeger HD; Alken P
Chirurg; 1993 Oct; 64(10):775-83. PubMed ID: 8269740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Urologic laparoscopy.
Stanley KE; Winfield HN; Donovan JF
Surg Annu; 1994; 26():67-88. PubMed ID: 7905672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Laparoscopy in urology. Current status and perspectives].
Theiss M; Hofmockel G; Fromüller H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1993 Sep; 118(37):1331-5. PubMed ID: 8104139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopy in urology: perspectives and practice.
Coptcoat MJ
Br J Urol; 1992 Jun; 69(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 1386271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of laparoscopic urology.
Koo BC; Burgess NA; Rhodes M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jan; 17(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 12364997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopy in urology: present status, controversies, and future directions.
Matsuda T; Terachi T; Yoshida O
Int J Urol; 1996 Mar; 3(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 8689517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible self-retaining blades to facilitate "mini-incision" surgery.
Loughlin KR; Doyle CJ
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 May; 182(5):454-6. PubMed ID: 8620282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The standardization of a technic for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with radical lymphadenectomy].
Sartori CA; Franzato B
Chir Ital; 1999; 51(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 10633846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frontiers in laparoscopy: economic issues and future perspectives.
Clayman RV
Contemp Urol; 1996 Jan; 8(1):25-9, 32-4, 37. PubMed ID: 10172706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: Busby JE, Brown GA, Matin SF. Comparing lymphadenectomy during radical nephroureterectomy: open versus laparoscopic (Urology 71:413-416, 2008).
Chung SD; Liao CH; Chueh SC
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):949; author reply 949-50. PubMed ID: 18674806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a Doppler probe in laparoscopic surgery.
Loughlin KR; Brooks DC
J Laparoendosc Surg; 1992 Jun; 2(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 1535814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic urology: at the crossroads.
Loughlin KR
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1994; 83(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 7944220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.
Davol P; Sumfest J; Rukstalis D
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):199. PubMed ID: 16413370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Laparoscopic intervention in pediatric urology].
Nyirády P; Merksz M; Pirót L; Altorjay A; Pelényi A; Kiss A; Csontai A
Orv Hetil; 1999 Jun; 140(25):1403-6. PubMed ID: 10489767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of bilateral nerve sparing laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer.
Steiner H; Zangerl F; Stöhr B; Granig T; Ho H; Bartsch G; Peschel R
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1348-52; discussion 1352-3. PubMed ID: 18707723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: current concepts and limitations.
Steiner H; Peschel R; Bartsch G
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9 Pt B):1376-80. PubMed ID: 19840016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Results and complications of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicocele.
Esposito C; Monguzzi G; Gonzalez-Sabin MA; Rubino R; Montinaro L; Papparella A; Esposito G; Settimi A; Mastroianni L; Zamparelli M; Sacco R; Amici G; Damiano R; Innaro N
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 May; 36(5):767-9. PubMed ID: 11329585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
