These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148097)
1. A case for nonionic contrast media--despite the high cost. Lieberman EB; Bashore TM J Crit Illn; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1853-4, 1860. PubMed ID: 10148097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonionic contrast media induced sialadenitis following coronary angiography. Erdoğan D; Güllü H; Calişkan M; Ulus T; Müderrisoğlu H Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2006 Sep; 6(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 16943115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media]. Seyferth W Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Saving time, saving money: a time and motion study with contrast management systems. Lehmann C; Hotaling M J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):118-21; quiz 122. PubMed ID: 15687541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Choice of contrast in left main coronary disease. Kussmaul WG Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 May; 44(1):102. PubMed ID: 9600538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An economic analysis of strategies for the use of contrast media for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Foley RN; Detsky AS Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 7808208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Temporary blindness after coronary angiography]. Ozmen N; Cebeci BS; Kardeşoğlu E; Saraçoğlu M; Dinçtürk M Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2006 Sep; 6(3):286. PubMed ID: 16943120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Benness GT Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):646-8. PubMed ID: 1943970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is dependent on the quality of the NEPHRIC study. Hocher B Am Heart J; 2006 Jan; 151(1):e5; author reply e7. PubMed ID: 16368282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical blindness following coronary angiography. Kuruvilla A Singapore Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(8):394-5. PubMed ID: 11764060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An unusual but dramatic complication of coronary angiography: transient cortical blindness. Tatli E; Buyuklu M; Altun A Int J Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 121(1):e4-6. PubMed ID: 17692963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologists dither over use of nonionic contrast. Tilke B Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Feb; 20(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 10187443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do benefits of contrast outweigh its costs? Cosgrove DO; Blomley MJ Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Sep; Suppl():AU31-2. PubMed ID: 10170152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of radiological contrast media in animal models of experimental thrombosis. Levi M; Biemond BJ; Stuck A; Wouter ten Cate J Semin Hematol; 1991 Oct; 28(4 Suppl 7):27-30; discussion 38-41. PubMed ID: 1822607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Selection of contrast media: current status of understanding]. Briguori C G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 19348144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents. Paulin S N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(3):202-3; author reply 204-5. PubMed ID: 1608418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]