These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148256)

  • 1. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    Neonatal Intensive Care; 1992; 5(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 10148256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human fetal breathing monitoring--clinical considerations.
    Manning FA; Platt LD
    Semin Perinatol; 1980 Oct; 4(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 7001639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 1991; 19(1-2):33-7. PubMed ID: 1870054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The significance of internal electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate. Report of 144 cases].
    Li K
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1991 Jan; 71(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 1850651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association?
    Parer JT; King T; Flanders S; Fox M; Kilpatrick SJ
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16753769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
    Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the false-reaction non-stress test].
    Zhang DT
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jul; 20(4):199-202, 252. PubMed ID: 4053776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Rapid microanalysis of lactate in cord blood and at fetal scalp blood sampling].
    Boog G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Mar; 32(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 15123123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Acute fetal distress].
    Boog G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Sep; 30(5):393-432. PubMed ID: 11598554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Non-stress test. Evaluation of a new scheme for reading the results].
    Giannone R; Bernorio R; Bernardi F; Panizzardi G; Zandonini GF
    Minerva Ginecol; 1989 Feb; 41(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 2747995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-hormonal methods of antenatal monitoring.
    Baillie P
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1974 Apr; 1(1):103-22. PubMed ID: 4220157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
    Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Remote fetal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus].
    Zhan Y; Xiang YM; Qi WH; Wang AM; Chen WP; Shao DH
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1053-4, 1057. PubMed ID: 15447862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of fetal scalp lactate sampling during labour: a comparative study with scalp pH].
    Ramanah R; Martin A; Riethmuller D; Maillet R; Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Mar; 33(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 15848081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [False-positive tests in prenatal fetal monitoring. Role of atropine in the differential diagnosis].
    Avila Gamboa D; López García R; Shor Pinsker V; Karchmer S
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1978 Apr; 43(258):259-67. PubMed ID: 689425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.