These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148335)

  • 21. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shear bond strength of a new polycarbonate bracket--an in vitro study with 14 adhesives.
    Akin-Nergiz N; Nergiz I; Behlfelt K; Platzer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Jun; 18(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 8791893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro evaluation of an adhesive monomer as a bonding agent for orthodontic brackets to primary teeth and nickel-chromium ion crowns.
    Ergas RP; Hondrum SO; Mathieu GP; Koonce JD
    Pediatr Dent; 1995; 17(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 7617496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shear bond strength of an amorphous calcium-phosphate-containing orthodontic resin cement.
    Dunn WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 17276866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A modified direct technique versus conventional direct placement of brackets: in vitro bond strength comparison.
    McAlarney ME; Brenn P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 8249933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study.
    Al-Munajed MK; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets treated with Sebond.
    Mizrahi B; Mizrahi E; Cleaton-Jones PE
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Aug; 22(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 7577873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro evaluation of the tensile and shear strengths of four adhesives used in orthodontics.
    McSherry PF
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 18(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 8921653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.
    Vaheed NA; Gupta M; David SA; Sam G; Ramanna PK; Bhagvandas SC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 30287702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tensile bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing light-curing adhesive. An in vitro comparative study.
    Aasrum E; Ng'ang'a PM; Dahm S; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 8322723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Böhme A
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 11725672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of shear bond strength with different enamel pre-treatments.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Wahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15130041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.
    Banerjee S; Banerjee R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 22406726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):466-9. PubMed ID: 11771785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain.
    Zachrisson YO; Zachrisson BU; Büyükyilmaz T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):420-30. PubMed ID: 8638584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.