BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148456)

  • 1. Modern developments in clinical perimetry.
    Johnson CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 4(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 10148456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated perimetry in the management of glaucoma.
    Lalle PA; Fingeret M; Eiden SB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):900-11. PubMed ID: 2693510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What are the options of psychophysical approaches in glaucoma?
    Monhart M
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17998037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of new psychophysics and perimetry with electrophysiological techniques in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Arden GB
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 4(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 10148457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter.
    Gardiner SK; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Vision Res; 2004 Apr; 44(8):839-48. PubMed ID: 14967209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry.
    Tan JC; Franks WA; Hitchings RA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 240(7):585-92. PubMed ID: 12136293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
    Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for eyelid elevation in glaucoma patients with ptosis during automated perimetry testing.
    Nesher R; Almog Y; Gorck L; Epstein E; Trick GL
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 17473742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.