These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148456)

  • 21. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
    Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Standard automated perimetry and algorithms for monitoring glaucoma progression.
    Scuderi GL; Cesareo M; Perdicchi A; Recupero SM
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():77-99. PubMed ID: 18929103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative effectiveness of modified selective perimetry in the early detection of visual field changes in glaucoma].
    Sabaeva GF; Nemtseev GI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1986; 102(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 3727256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Fogagnolo P; Rossetti L; Ranno S; Ferreras A; Orzalesi N
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():101-24. PubMed ID: 18929104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship.
    Anderson RS
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2006 Jan; 25(1):79-97. PubMed ID: 16081311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds.
    Maddess T; James AC; Goldberg I; Wine S; Dobinson J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):3827-32. PubMed ID: 11053282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Frequency doubling perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucomatous optic nerve fiber damage].
    Korzekwa W; Korzekwa M; Markowska J; Wójcik-Niklewska B; Romaniuk W; Korzekwa A; Michalska-Małecka K
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):222-4. PubMed ID: 15510506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
    Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss: why, what, where, and how.
    Mansberger SL; Demirel S
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2005 Sep; 18(3):365-73, v-vi. PubMed ID: 16054994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the Synemed Glaucoma and the Humphrey 30-2 threshold perimetry tests.
    Harwood LW; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Apr; 70(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 10457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interpretation of automated perimetry.
    Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 267():191-7. PubMed ID: 9745830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Method for static perimetrie in visual field deficits due to glaucoma].
    Dannheim F; Drance SM
    Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges; 1974; 72():353-9. PubMed ID: 4480223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Static circular perimetry under photopic conditions in glaucoma].
    Ourgaud AG; Chagnon A
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1976; 76(5-6):505-11. PubMed ID: 1052148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Automated perimetry].
    Flammer J
    Ther Umsch; 1990 Apr; 47(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 2191463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Diagnostic value of the nasal step in the visual field as an early sign of glaucoma].
    Nemtseev GI; Sabaeva GF
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1980; (4):7-8. PubMed ID: 7414816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.