582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148473)
1. Medical consultation and expert testimony in claims litigation. Professional and ethical guidelines.
Roberts HJ
J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 10148473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The medical expert witness: legal and ethical issues.
Hirsch P
Clin Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 28(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 20347668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. When two heads are not better than one.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 19121513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues related to medical expert testimony.
Hammond CB; Schwartz PA
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 16260525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 11986466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
Franzki H
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The HSAN's judgments are mostly fair and judicious. But human errors do occur].
Lindberg B
Lakartidningen; 2002 Feb; 99(7):616-8. PubMed ID: 11887705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.
Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP
J Child Neurol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 23504251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How should forensic psychiatry police itself? Guidelines and grievances: the AAPL Committee on Ethics.
Weinstein HC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 6478071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medical expert assessment in the Anglo-American lawsuit].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 9064941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. A call to arms.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 10229897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.
Conn Med; 1986 Dec; 50(12):831. PubMed ID: 3816224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [A comment to a TV program about activities of medical experts].
Tullberg T
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(24):2778-9. PubMed ID: 12101609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical guidelines for expert medical witnesses.
Hendricks WM
N C Med J; 1989 Jul; 50(7):378-9. PubMed ID: 2755516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical-legal consultation in gastroenterology.
Greene ML
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1995 Apr; 5(2):403-19. PubMed ID: 7620734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness.
Crosby E
Can J Anaesth; 2007 Mar; 54(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 17331936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicine on trial. Physicians' attitudes about expert medical witnesses.
Eitel DR; Hegeman RJ; Evans ER
J Leg Med; 1997 Sep; 18(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 9394925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony.
Muroff JA; Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 17411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of internet sites regarding independent medical examinations: implications for clinical neuropsychological practitioners.
Horwitz JE; McCaffrey RJ
Appl Neuropsychol; 2006; 13(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 17361670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
