These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10148526)

  • 1. Perils and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.
    Schiffer RB; Giang DW; Mushlin A; Ketonen L; Joy S; Kido D; Goodman AD; Mattson DH; Mooney C
    J Neuroimaging; 1993 Apr; 3(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10148526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. The Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Group.
    Mushlin AI; Detsky AS; Phelps CE; O'Connor PW; Kido DK; Kucharczyk W; Giang DW; Mooney C; Tansey CM; Hall WJ
    JAMA; 1993 Jun 23-30; 269(24):3146-51. PubMed ID: 8505818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging and ancillary testing. Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Study Group.
    Giang DW; Grow VM; Mooney C; Mushlin AI; Goodman AD; Mattson DH; Schiffer RB
    Arch Neurol; 1994 Jan; 51(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 8274111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of paraclinical and CSF studies in the diagnosis of MS in patients presenting with partial cervical transverse myelopathy and negative cranial MRI.
    Bashir K; Whitaker JN
    Mult Scler; 2000 Oct; 6(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 11064439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
    Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of test result sequencing in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.
    O'Connor P; Tansey C; Kucharczyk W; Detsky AS
    Arch Neurol; 1994 Jan; 51(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8274110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Giesser BS; Kurtzberg D; Vaughan HG; Arezzo JC; Aisen ML; Smith CR; LaRocca NG; Scheinberg LC
    Arch Neurol; 1987 Mar; 44(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 3827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance imaging criteria.
    Nielsen JM; Korteweg T; Barkhof F; Uitdehaag BM; Polman CH
    Ann Neurol; 2005 Nov; 58(5):781-3. PubMed ID: 16240352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of cervical cord MRI and brain magnetization transfer imaging to the assessment of individual patients with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study.
    Rovaris M; Holtmannspötter M; Rocca MA; Iannucci G; Codella M; Viti B; Campi A; Comi G; Yousry TA; Filippi M
    Mult Scler; 2002 Feb; 8(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 11936489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conversion to multiple sclerosis after a clinically isolated syndrome of the brainstem: cranial magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and neurophysiological findings.
    Sastre-Garriga J; Tintoré M; Rovira A; Grivé E; Pericot I; Comabella M; Thompson AJ; Montalban X
    Mult Scler; 2003 Feb; 9(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 12617267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging, evoked responses, and spinal fluid electrophoresis.
    Farlow MR; Markand ON; Edwards MK; Stevens JC; Kolar OJ
    Neurology; 1986 Jun; 36(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 3703290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between multimodal evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.
    Comi G; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Filippi M; Canal N; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A
    J Neurol; 1989 Jan; 236(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 2915225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other instrumental examinations.
    Rumbach L; Collard M; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Armspach JP; Gounot D; Chambron J
    Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():125-8. PubMed ID: 3654174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to develop multiple sclerosis in patients with neurologic symptoms without objective evidence.
    Boster A; Caon C; Perumal J; Hreha S; Zabad R; Zak I; Tselis A; Lisak R; Khan O
    Mult Scler; 2008 Jul; 14(6):804-8. PubMed ID: 18573830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sensitivity of criteria for MRI interpretation in patients with multiple sclerosis].
    Perić V; Drulović J; Stojsavljević N; Sokić D; Dragutinović G; Lević Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1997; 125(1-2):14-8. PubMed ID: 17974350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between chemical analysis and magnetic resonance imaging with the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Papadopoulos NM; McFarlin DE; Patronas NJ; McFarland HF; Costello R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Sep; 88(3):365-8. PubMed ID: 3630976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT.
    Paty DW; Oger JJ; Kastrukoff LF; Hashimoto SA; Hooge JP; Eisen AA; Eisen KA; Purves SJ; Low MD; Brandejs V
    Neurology; 1988 Feb; 38(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 3340277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.
    Barkhof F; Filippi M; Miller DH; Scheltens P; Campi A; Polman CH; Comi G; Adèr HJ; Losseff N; Valk J
    Brain; 1997 Nov; 120 ( Pt 11)():2059-69. PubMed ID: 9397021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative impact of paraclinical studies in establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Gilmore RL; Kasarskis EJ; Carr WA; Norvell E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Nov; 73(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 2479522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis.
    Filippini G; Comi GC; Cosi V; Bevilacqua L; Ferrarini M; Martinelli V; Bergamaschi R; Filippi M; Citterio A; D'Incerti L
    J Neurol; 1994 Jan; 241(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 8164014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.