These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149437)
1. Design quality--the key to product success. Campbell I Med Device Technol; 1991; 2(8):28-35. PubMed ID: 10149437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design control--the ultimate protection? Hendra IR Med Device Technol; 1991 Apr; 2(3):20-7. PubMed ID: 10149435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidance on submitting quality system information. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 15154336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observations on medical device design, Part I: Current practice. Clarkson J; Alexander K; Bishop D Med Device Technol; 1999 Sep; 10(7):28-31. PubMed ID: 10623354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controlling the quality of raw materials. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10176139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical investigations: taking a global approach, part I. Schaefer JF; Jessup G Med Device Technol; 1993 Nov; 4(9):38-43. PubMed ID: 10146503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of the Medical Device Directive in Italy. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1998 May; 9(4):33-5. PubMed ID: 10180744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal accidents: human error and medical equipment design. Dain S Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 12538141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differing definitions of manufacturer. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 10182120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach. Malhotra S; Laxmisan A; Keselman A; Zhang J; Patel VL J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15694884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety by design in electromedical equipment: Part I. Loznen SP Med Device Technol; 1995 Nov; 6(9):24-30. PubMed ID: 10158129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality planning conundrum. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1999; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 10623345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Exploration on the regulation mode of medical device quality and safety on a life-circle basis]. Yu HL; Qian XS Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):120-2, 133. PubMed ID: 16830806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. German law: the differences. Müller-Lierheim WG Med Device Technol; 1997 Nov; 8(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 10174630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectively incorporating risk management into quality systems. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2006 Jun; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 16903387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S.-Sino safety pact called 'modest start'. Experts say more must be done to ensure safe drug, medical device imports. Rhea S Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec; 37(50):12-3. PubMed ID: 18200957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the new quality management system standards on the CE-marking process. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2001; 12(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11317864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mistake proofing and redundancy in machine validation. Blake N Med Device Technol; 2003; 14(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 12974126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]