These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149561)

  • 1. Anatomic Porous Replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases.
    Dorr LD; Absatz M; Gruen TA; Saberi MT; Doerzbacher JF
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 10149561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between thigh pain and radiological findings with a proximally porous-coated stem.
    Kinov P; Radl R; Zacherl M; Leithner A; Windhager R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Oct; 73(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 18019918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load transfer with the Austin Moore cementless hip prosthesis.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Orthop Res; 1993 Mar; 11(2):272-84. PubMed ID: 8483040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental studies of bone remodeling in total hip arthroplasty.
    Sumner DR; Turner TM; Urban RM; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):83-90. PubMed ID: 1537179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total hip arthroplasty with the porous-coated anatomic hip prosthesis: results at 11 to 18 years.
    Little BS; Wixson RL; Stulberg SD
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 16627140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load.
    Tägil M
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2000 Feb; 290():1-40. PubMed ID: 10745934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface.
    Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):202-12. PubMed ID: 1729005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement.
    Wan Z; Dorr LD; Woodsome T; Ranawat A; Song M
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Feb; 14(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 10065719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
    Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of stem alignment on results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless tapered-wedge femoral component.
    Min BW; Song KS; Bae KC; Cho CH; Kang CH; Kim SY
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18358382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between an Anatomic Short Stem and a Straight Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Koyano G; Jinno T; Koga D; Yamauchi Y; Muneta T; Okawa A
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):594-600. PubMed ID: 27554784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative results of a distal modular sleeve, circumferential coating, and stiffness relief using the Anatomic Porous Replacement II.
    Dorr LD; Wan Z
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8792249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous-coated materials.
    Collier JP; Mayor MB; Chae JC; Surprenant VA; Surprenant HP; Dauphinais LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):173-80. PubMed ID: 3416524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.