These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149634)
1. Drug use review principles adopted by key organizations. A framework for better drug use review. Fritz DL AAPPO J; 1991; 1(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 10149634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Principles of drug-use review approved by APhA, AMA, and PMA. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Oct; 48(10):2062. PubMed ID: 1781458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The utility of an organized drug data base in determining contributions to the quality and efficiency of Medicaid programs. Roden DR; Kennard LH Drug Inf J; 1975; 9(2-3):131-7. PubMed ID: 10297122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PRO manual changes details of review. Cofer J J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 May; 56(5):24-7. PubMed ID: 10273648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The PSRO and drug utilization review. Provost GP Am J Hosp Pharm; 1973 Jul; 30(7):583. PubMed ID: 4736661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What the toughest of the PROs is doing to doctors. Frederick L Med Econ; 1985 Jul; 62(15):76-83. PubMed ID: 10300192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated review of medical practice in the Medicaid program: benefits for providers. MacKay C J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(2):23-8. PubMed ID: 10297484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Medicaid drug cost control experiences. Kennard LH; Platt WG Med Mark Media; 1979 Mar; 14(3):38, 40-3. PubMed ID: 10316799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of regulations governing utilization review by skilled nursing facilities. Sway EM Med Rec News; 1975 Jun; 46(3):56-63. PubMed ID: 10297193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A successful partnership to improve prescribing practices. Parks JJ Psychiatr Serv; 2006 Oct; 57(10):1528-9. PubMed ID: 17076038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Part 405--Federal health insurance for the aged and disabled. Utilization review: conditions of participation. Med Rec News; 1975 Apr; 46(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 10297192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Voluntary review guidelines released. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(39):14. PubMed ID: 10107187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Priorities in utilization review. Jones B Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Apr; 3(4):50-1. PubMed ID: 10307590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]