These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149725)

  • 1. Conversion to nonionics packs economic punch.
    Brumbaugh J; Young SW; Cohen D
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Jul; 13(7):99-104. PubMed ID: 10149725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast media markdown.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Dec; 18(12):49-51, 54, 59. PubMed ID: 10163650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media.
    Benness GT
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):646-8. PubMed ID: 1943970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Materials managers clip contrast media costs.
    Barlow RD
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1992 Jun; 17(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10119199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?
    Hirshfeld JW
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):482-4. PubMed ID: 1732775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast media cost analysis--I.
    Zbrozek AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(3):826; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 8113571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast media cost analysis--II.
    Olukotun AY
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(3):826-7; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 8113572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s: prices change.
    Palmisano SM
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):309; discussion 312-4. PubMed ID: 9114078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast media costs can be reduced still more.
    Campbell JW
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 May; 22(5):12. PubMed ID: 10167086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost of preventing adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast agents.
    Millward SF
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):871-2. PubMed ID: 8184084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ionic vs. nonionic contrast media.
    Lloyd K
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7997528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Managing costly contrast agents.
    MacEwan DW; Hobbs BB
    Dimens Health Serv; 1990 Mar; 67(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 2365151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The price of cost savings.
    Baker RM
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jun; 24(5):381-3. PubMed ID: 18496301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The significance of the costs of contrast media for society].
    Göthlin JH
    Rontgenpraxis; 1992 Jul; 45(7):232-3. PubMed ID: 1519119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low osmolar contrast media.
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Jan; 39(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 3338235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do benefits of contrast outweigh its costs?
    Cosgrove DO; Blomley MJ
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Sep; Suppl():AU31-2. PubMed ID: 10170152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The new low osmolar contrast media.
    Fischer HW
    Eur J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 6(4):242-3. PubMed ID: 3792316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The adoption of low-osmolar contrast agents in the United States: historical analysis of health policy and clinical practice.
    Wilmot A; Mehta N; Jha S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1049-53. PubMed ID: 23096178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness and safety of selective use of low-osmolality contrast media.
    Michalson A; Franken EA; Smith W
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9419466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.