These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
14. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography]. Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies. Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee. Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe M; Conant EF; Gatsonis C Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 17885176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifacts in digital mammography. Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview. Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography. Martin JE Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Canadian test screens mammogram readers. Wagner SK Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 10150904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]