These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149736)

  • 1. Art of positioning needs revival in mammography.
    Eklund GW; Cardenosa G
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):131-40. PubMed ID: 10149736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mammography 1994, Part I].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8312504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs.
    Williams MB; Fajardo LL
    Acad Radiol; 1996 May; 3(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 8796697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality of screening mammography: effect on clinical outcome.
    Feig SA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):805-7. PubMed ID: 11906850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why MQSA? Why now?
    Arcarese JS
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 7997527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Recommendations for a QA program for digital mammography].
    Noel A; Stines J; Heid P; Lisbona A; Verdun FR; Barreau B; Caselles O; Hagay C; Isnard A; Levy L; Marelle P; Séradour B; Tardivon A; Thibaut F; Tournemaine N; Valentin F;
    J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 84(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 12910183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Screen-grid mammography].
    Sokolov OB; Blinov NN; Zaltsman IN; Rozhkova NI; Zubritskiĭ VN
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1991; (1):50-3. PubMed ID: 1365511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quo vadis: where are we going?
    Adkins M; Eastman TR; Murray KL
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(4):468-9; discussion 469. PubMed ID: 25835415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality in mammography: physical and technical limitations.
    Nielsen B
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():1-14. PubMed ID: 3296052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast techniques excel at image display.
    Yaffe MJ
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 May; 15(5):79-85, 105. PubMed ID: 10148580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Harmonization of images in radiology of the breast].
    Solsona F; Martinez Comin L; Martinez Comin MP
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56 suppl 1():329-32. PubMed ID: 1232198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality criteria in Mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Brezina K; Czech W
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Nov; 32(11):602-7. PubMed ID: 515651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
    Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
    Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee.
    Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe M; Conant EF; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 17885176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography.
    Martin JE
    Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Canadian test screens mammogram readers.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 10150904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.