These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. The future of medical sonography. Merton DA Biomed Instrum Technol; 2008; 42(4):332. PubMed ID: 18662074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Features to consider when selecting new ultrasound imaging systems. Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jul; 8(7):521-3. PubMed ID: 21723494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A study of the relationship between routine ultrasound quality assurance parameters and subjective operator image assessment. Metcalfe SC; Evans JA Br J Radiol; 1992 Jul; 65(775):570-5. PubMed ID: 1515892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. How perfect are you with defective probes? Information on the results of the mini-trial on technical quality assurance during the "Ultraschall 2012" conference in Davos. Rosenfeld E; Jenderka KV; Kopp A; Keim V Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 23558398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Quality of sonography in internal medicine]. Bönhof JA; Linhart P Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Aug; 111(33):1227-9. PubMed ID: 3527639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. How reliable are manufacturer's reported acoustic output data? Jago JR; Henderson J; Whittingham TA; Willson K Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(1):135-6. PubMed ID: 7754574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Use of systems approach to solving regional problems of renewal of the stock of ultrasound scanners (the case of the Smolensk Region)]. Demin VA; Miliagin VA; Alekseenko AA Med Tekh; 2001; (1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11244855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Vaginal ultrasound for the practicing clinician. Equipment selection. Peisner DB Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 39(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 8635296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]