These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149785)

  • 1. Bacterial contamination at abdominal hysterectomy: a comparison of staple closure with regular suture closure of the vaginal wall.
    Beresford JM; MacKenzie AM
    J Gynecol Surg; 1991; 7(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 10149785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Abdominal hysterectomy without internal peritonealization: primary vaginal closure with stapler or open and drained vagina].
    Nagele F; Kurz C; Husslein P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 8013858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal hysterectomy: comparison of closed cuff, open cuff, and staple closure techniques.
    Wolf D
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 Jun; 79(10):625-31. PubMed ID: 6993437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contemporary views on perioperative complications and adhaesion formation after vaginal hysterectomy, in relation to peritoneal closure vs. non-closure in combination with open vs. closed vaginal cuff].
    Watrowski R; Friebe Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):973-9. PubMed ID: 17373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the open and closed cuff method of vaginal dome closure in total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Rochowiak MW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 Mar; 79(7):472-8. PubMed ID: 6987199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrafascial abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: a reappraisal.
    Jaszczak SE; Evans TN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Apr; 59(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 7078894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbable staples in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Buka NJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Feb; 166(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 3336831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of copolymer staple versus chromic suture during hysterectomy: gross, histologic, and microbiologic findings.
    McNeeley SG; Elkins TE; Portz DM; Warren J; DeLancey JO
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 72(6):862-5. PubMed ID: 3186094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic stapling techniques in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Beresford JM
    Surg Clin North Am; 1984 Jun; 64(3):609-18. PubMed ID: 6379935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unusual complications following abdominal hysterectomy: dyspareunia and consort glans laceration after vaginal cuff stapling.
    Zerner J; Miller BA; Nelson BD
    J Maine Med Assoc; 1980 Jun; 71(6):169-70, 73. PubMed ID: 6993594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method of continuous vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy.
    Berman ML; Grosen EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 8058253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morcellation laparoscopic hysterectomy of the CASH (Classical, Abdominal, Semm, Hysterectomy) type].
    Rosales Delgado JA; González-Sicilia Cotter E; González Vergara R; Aedo Ocaña O
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Dec; 62():378-80. PubMed ID: 7835735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dyspareunia from auto suture staples. A report of two cases.
    Messitt JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Mar; 49(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 840468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prevention of urinary and pelvic infections in radical abdominal hysterectomies, vaginal and abdomino-vaginal operations].
    Draca P; Gavanski K; Miljković S
    Med Pregl; 1980; 33(7-8):265-7. PubMed ID: 7207401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prophylactic effect of the open vaginal vault method in reducing febrile morbidity in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Neuman M; Beller U; Ben Chetrit A; Lavie O; Boldes R; Diamant Y
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):591-3. PubMed ID: 8322135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Automatic suture stapling in abdominal hysterectomy].
    Bendvold E; Dahl OE; Havig O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Jan; 106(3):199. PubMed ID: 3513367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of vaginal cuff closure and preservation of vaginal depth during transvaginal hysterectomy.
    Cruikshank SH; Pixley RL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3299181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized study to compare a closed vault technique using absorbable staples at the time of abdominal hysterectomy versus open vault technique.
    Kalbfleisch RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Oct; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 1411891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.