BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149962)

  • 1. Comparison of bone screw holding strength in healthy bovine and osteoporotic human cancellous bone.
    Turner IG; Rice GN
    Clin Mater; 1992; 9(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 10149962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction strength of cannulated cancellous bone screws.
    Hearn TC; Schatzker J; Wolfson N
    J Orthop Trauma; 1993; 7(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 8459298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pullout strength of cancellous screws in human femoral heads depends on applied insertion torque, trabecular bone microarchitecture and areal bone mineral density.
    Ab-Lazid R; Perilli E; Ryan MK; Costi JJ; Reynolds KJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Dec; 40():354-361. PubMed ID: 25265033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.
    Chapman JR; Harrington RM; Lee KM; Anderson PA; Tencer AF; Kowalski D
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 8872262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fine thread versus coarse thread. A comparison of the maximum holding power.
    Gausepohl T; Möhring R; Pennig D; Koebke J
    Injury; 2001 Dec; 32 Suppl 4():SD1-7. PubMed ID: 11812471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical evaluation of a 4-mm cancellous "rescue" screw in osteoporotic cortical bone: a cadaveric study.
    Wall SJ; Soin SP; Knight TA; Mears SC; Belkoff SM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 20502222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaction bone-grafting increases the holding power of cancellous screws in the femoral head. A pull-out study in human cadaver hips.
    Lenzner A; Kaur I; Haviko T; Sõgel V; Gapejeva J; Ereline J; Pääsuke M
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Feb; 70(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10191743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
    Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
    Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screws in normal and osteoporotic bone material.
    Battula S; Schoenfeld A; Vrabec G; Njus GO
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 16500737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro pullout strength of screws inserted in adult equine third metacarpal bone after overdrilling a 4.5-mm threaded insertion hole.
    Sedrish SA; Moore RM; Kelly K; Martin GS; Burba DJ
    Vet Surg; 1998; 27(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 9525030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pullout strengths of cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws.
    Thompson JD; Benjamin JB; Szivek JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Aug; (341):241-9. PubMed ID: 9269180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models.
    Patel PS; Shepherd DE; Hukins DW
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Oct; 32(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 20558097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of pilot hole size on the insertion torque and pullout strength of self-tapping cortical bone screws in osteoporotic bone.
    Battula S; Schoenfeld AJ; Sahai V; Vrabec GA; Tank J; Njus GO
    J Trauma; 2008 Apr; 64(4):990-5. PubMed ID: 18404066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biomechanical study comparing a raft of 3.5 mm cortical screws with 6.5 mm cancellous screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures.
    Patil S; Mahon A; Green S; McMurtry I; Port A
    Knee; 2006 Jun; 13(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 16647262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancellous bone screw thread design and holding power.
    Asnis SE; Ernberg JJ; Bostrom MP; Wright TM; Harrington RM; Tencer A; Peterson M
    J Orthop Trauma; 1996; 10(7):462-9. PubMed ID: 8892145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axial pull-out strength of 3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous bone screws placed in canine proximal tibias using manual and power tapping.
    Demko JL; Soniat ME; Elder S; McLaughlin R
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 18704238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pilot hole diameter and tapping on insertion torque and axial pullout strength of 4.0-mm cancellous bone screws.
    Kunkel KA; Suber JT; Gerard PD; Kowaleski MP
    Am J Vet Res; 2011 Dec; 72(12):1660-5. PubMed ID: 22126695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type of screw does not influence holding power in the femoral head: a cadaver study with shearing test.
    Jenny JY; Rapp E; Cordey J
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Oct; 70(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 10622474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical tests and finite element models for bone holding power of tibial locking screws.
    Hou SM; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Chao CK; Lin J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Aug; 19(7):738-45. PubMed ID: 15288461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.