These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10149982)

  • 1. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Clin Mater; 1992; 10(3):153-201. PubMed ID: 10149982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.
    Steigenga JT; al-Shammari KF; Nociti FH; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2003; 12(4):306-17. PubMed ID: 14752967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical aspects of the optimal number of implants to carry a cross-arch full restoration.
    Brunski JB
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7 Suppl 2():S111-31. PubMed ID: 24977245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Force and movement of non-osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study.
    Flanagan D; Ilies H; Lasko B; Stack J
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):270-6. PubMed ID: 20017642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-to-bone force transmission: a pilot study for in vivo strain gauge measurement technique.
    Cozzolino F; Apicella D; Wang G; Apicella A; Sorrentino R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():173-181. PubMed ID: 30366308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bioengineered implant for a predetermined bone cellular response to loading forces. A literature review and case report.
    Misch CE; Bidez MW; Sharawy M
    J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1276-86. PubMed ID: 11577963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
    Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal selection of dental implant for different bone conditions based on the mechanical response.
    Roy S; DAS M; Chakraborty P; Biswas JK; Chatterjee S; Khutia N; Saha S; Chowdhury AR
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 28869633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.
    Kim DG; Kwon HJ; Jeong YH; Kosel E; Lee DJ; Han JS; Kim HL; Kim DJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 26832783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review.
    Chang M; Chronopoulos V; Mattheos N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 23918506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Force required to luxate a newly placed dental implant in bone: an in vitro pilot study.
    Flanagan D; Ilies H; Raby M; Stevenson R
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 18616073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect on Bone Architecture of Marginal Grooves in Dental Implants Under Occlusal Loaded Conditions in Beagle Dogs.
    Kato H; Kuroshima S; Inaba N; Uto Y; Sawase T
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 29135387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss.
    Naert I; Duyck J; Vandamme K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():95-107. PubMed ID: 23062133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trials of endosseous implants: issues in analysis and interpretation.
    Listgarten MA
    Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):299-313. PubMed ID: 9151563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.