These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150015)

  • 1. Chromic catgut suture should be abandoned for fascial closure of the anterior abdominal wall in favor of newer, stronger delayed absorbable suture materials. Con.
    Roseff SJ; Breen JL
    J Gynecol Surg; 1990; 6(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 10150015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromic catgut suture should be abandoned for fascial closure of the anterior abdominal wall in favor of newer, stronger delayed absorbable suture materials. Pro.
    Aronson MP; Lee RA
    J Gynecol Surg; 1990; 6(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10150014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties.
    Pavan A; Bosio M; Longo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder].
    Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP
    Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Studies concerning the usefulness of catgut, PGA and polyester for abdominal fascia closure (author's transl)].
    Tauber R; Seidel W; Mees P
    Res Exp Med (Berl); 1975 Jul; 165(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials.
    Rochat MC; Lin J; Pope ER; Carson WL; Wagner-Mann CC; Pace LW
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
    Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A
    Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new synthetic absorbable suture.
    Postlethwait RW; Smith BM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Mar; 140(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 123087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suture materials, 1980s: properties, uses, and abuses.
    Swanson NA; Tromovitch TA
    Int J Dermatol; 1982 Sep; 21(7):373-8. PubMed ID: 6752052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common bile duct healing. Do different absorbable sutures affect stricture formation and tensile strength?
    Sharp KW; Ross CB; Tillman VN; Dunn JF
    Arch Surg; 1989 Apr; 124(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 2930349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern synthetic suture materials and abdominal wound closure techniques in gynaecological surgery.
    Scheidel P; Hohl MK
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Jun; 1(2):223-46. PubMed ID: 2961498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Suture material in vaginal hysterectomy].
    Tsuji A; Ohta C; Ohta Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 3973429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The disintegration of absorbable suture materials on exposure to human digestive juices: an update.
    Tian F; Appert HE; Howard JM
    Am Surg; 1994 Apr; 60(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 8129252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds.
    Nilsson T
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.