These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150015)

  • 21. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study.
    Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of wound strength in normal, radiated and infected tissues closed with polyglycolic and chromic catgut sutures.
    Barham RE; Butz GW; Ansell JS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jun; 146(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 653565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evaluation of 7-0 Polyglactin 910 suture in cataract surgery.
    Blaydes JE
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1975; 6(4):99-104. PubMed ID: 1107925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of chromic catgut in the primary closure of scalp wounds in children.
    Start NJ; Armstrong AM; Robson WJ
    Arch Emerg Med; 1989 Sep; 6(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 2789586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oesophageal tissue reaction to different suture materials. An experimental study in the cat.
    Senyk J; Rank F
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 725566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suture materials currently used in obstetric-gynecologic surgery in the United States: a questionnaire survey.
    Hartko WJ; Ghanekar G; Kemmann E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 6281703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Review paper: absorbable polymeric surgical sutures: chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and performance.
    Pillai CK; Sharma CP
    J Biomater Appl; 2010 Nov; 25(4):291-366. PubMed ID: 20971780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon.
    Hastings JC; Winkle WV; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 May; 140(5):701-7. PubMed ID: 1145404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Skin wound approximation with new absorbable suture material.
    Webster RC; McCollough EG; Giandello PR; Smith RC
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1985 Aug; 111(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 4026661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of microcirculatory changes in the duodenum of dogs caused by surgical suture materials.
    Petö K; Nagy A; Hauck M; Mikó I; Furka I
    Acta Chir Hung; 1997; 36(1-4):274-6. PubMed ID: 9408372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimental study of suture of colonic wounds in the rabbit.
    Robbs JV
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Aug; 145(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 877844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tensile strength study of the abdominal wall following laparotomy synthesis using three types of surgical wires in Wistar rats.
    Rossi LF; Ramos RR; Kestering Dde M; Soldi Mda S; Ely JB; d'Acampora AJ
    Acta Cir Bras; 2008; 23(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 18278396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative study of suture materials: chromic gut and chromic gut treated with glycerin.
    Stone IK; von Fraunhofer JA; Masterson BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 151(8):1087-93. PubMed ID: 3885745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of effects of suture materials on wound healing in a rabbit pyeloplasty model.
    Wainstein M; Anderson J; Elder JS
    Urology; 1997 Feb; 49(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 9037292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Reaction of some suture materials on the process of intestinal healing. Experimental study (author's transl)].
    Randano F; Tartaglia A; Mazzeo F
    J Chir (Paris); 1979 Oct; 116(10):609-11. PubMed ID: 541362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The resistance of absorbable sutures in fetal tissue and fluids.
    Aktuğ T
    Turk J Pediatr; 1989; 31(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 2518585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.
    Hastings JC; Van Winkle W; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.