144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150070)
1. Computer options open new radiology windows.
Jaffe CC; Lemke HU
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13 Suppl():21-8. PubMed ID: 10150070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
Andriole KP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations in the choice and utilization of computers in radiology and nuclear medicine.
Williams LE; Loken MK
CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med; 1975 Feb; 6(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 1090413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guideline report. Picture archiving and communication systems.
Drew PG
Hosp Technol Ser; 1985; 4(16):1-58. PubMed ID: 10300279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Introduction to computer systems in diagnostic radiology.
Shannon RH
Med Instrum; 1978; 12(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 357942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From conventional radiology to diagnostic imaging: computed radiography.
Vecchioli A; Campioni P; Cristofaro M; Macis G
Rays; 1992; 17(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 1480782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Imaging technology in medicine].
Freyer R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():8-9. PubMed ID: 9859231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided diagnosis.
Rinaldi P; Menchini L; Martinelli M; Pastore G; Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 14509184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices.
Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):641-2. PubMed ID: 17502252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical imaging 2095.
Strauss J; Horii S
Adm Radiol; 1995 Aug; 14(8):41-3. PubMed ID: 10151505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Russian X-ray diagnostic equipment at the exhibition "Public Health-2001"].
Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):33-6. PubMed ID: 12512281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A grid architecture for medical applications.
Bucur A; Kootstra R; Belleman RG
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 112():127-37. PubMed ID: 15923722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Saying goodbye to yesterday.
Henderson C
Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 12584969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal IT support crucial to success in filmless department.
Shieh YY; Roberson GH
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Apr; 22(4):55-7, 59, 61-2 passim. PubMed ID: 10915543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Picture perfect. Cost-effective solutions help advanced medical imaging make business sense.
Hoke GE
Healthc Inform; 1999 Apr; 16(4):89-90, 92, 94-6. PubMed ID: 10538425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Principles of digital imaging.
van der Stelt PF
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems].
Zelikman MI
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A strategy to qualify the performance of radiographic monitors.
Gutierrez D; Monnin P; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):192-7. PubMed ID: 15933107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspectives and problems of digital radiography at the beginning of the third millennium.
Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14509174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
