163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150600)
1. Evaluation of experimental and finite element models of synthetic and cadaveric femora for pre-clinical design-analysis.
McNamara BP; Cristofolini L; Toni A; Taylor D
Clin Mater; 1994; 17(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 10150600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FE and experimental study on how the cortex material properties of synthetic femurs affect strain levels.
Lopes VMM; Neto MA; Amaro AM; Roseiro LM; Paulino MF
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():96-109. PubMed ID: 28645848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: a comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs.
Zdero R; Bougherara H; Dubov A; Shah S; Zalzal P; Mahfud A; Schemitsch EH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):831-40. PubMed ID: 20839651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of beam theory for estimating bone tissue modulus and yield stress from 3-point bending tests on rat femora.
Arias-Moreno AJ; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109654. PubMed ID: 32007225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue modulus calculated from beam theory is biased by bone size and geometry: implications for the use of three-point bending tests to determine bone tissue modulus.
van Lenthe GH; Voide R; Boyd SK; Müller R
Bone; 2008 Oct; 43(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 18639658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models.
Gardner MP; Chong AC; Pollock AG; Wooley PH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):613-20. PubMed ID: 20049637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Validated Open-Source Multisolver Fourth-Generation Composite Femur Model.
MacLeod AR; Rose H; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27618586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis.
Taylor WR; Roland E; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Klabunde R; Warner MD; Hobatho MC; Rakotomanana L; Clift SE
J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 12020996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated finite element analysis of excised human femora based on precision -QCT.
Merz B; Niederer P; Müller R; Rüegsegger P
J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 8872261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of the structural response of the femoral shaft under dynamic loading using subject-specific finite element models.
Park G; Kim T; Forman J; Panzer MB; Crandall JR
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Aug; 20(11):1151-1166. PubMed ID: 28632407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models.
Cristofolini L; Viceconti M; Cappello A; Toni A
J Biomech; 1996 Apr; 29(4):525-35. PubMed ID: 8964782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a strain rate dependent material model of human cortical bone for computer-aided reconstruction of injury mechanisms.
Asgharpour Z; Zioupos P; Graw M; Peldschus S
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():109-16. PubMed ID: 24529781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Schiffers N; Pandorf T; Radermacher K; Weichert D; Forst R
J Biomech; 2000 Oct; 33(10):1325-30. PubMed ID: 10899344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23017379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
