These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150899)

  • 21. Preliminary evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography. Six views.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Barrett BJ
    Radiology; 1970 May; 95(2):395-7. PubMed ID: 5439449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative studies on film-, xeroradio- and ultrasound-mammography of breast tumor.
    Inada G; Fujita S; Ishizaki M
    Nagoya Med J; 1969 Dec; 15(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 5373047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of roentgen exposure in mammography. I. Six views.
    Gilbertson JD; Randall MG; Fingerhut AG
    Radiology; 1970 May; 95(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 5439448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography.
    Keen JD
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Feb; 156(3):249-50; author reply 251. PubMed ID: 22312149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography.
    Imfeld S
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Feb; 156(3):250; author reply 251. PubMed ID: 22312150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography.
    Pinsky PF
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Feb; 156(3):250; author reply 251. PubMed ID: 22312151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of non-medical screeners and effect of low dose on film quality in a breast screening campaign.
    Hartley G
    Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):437-8. PubMed ID: 1236547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Localization of occult breast lesions: practical solutions to problems of triangulation.
    Swann CA; Kopans DB; McCarthy KA; White G; Hall DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):577-9. PubMed ID: 3562843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Xerography: a new horizon in mammography.
    Milbrath JR; Deeths TM
    Wis Med J; 1974 Apr; 73(4):S38-40. PubMed ID: 4821718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Some experiences with mammography with a brief review on recent trends and new techniques of examination of the breast.
    Khoo FY; Boon CK; Vaithilingam K; Huay LH
    Singapore Med J; 1968 Dec; 9(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 5728869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proper film emulsion for mammography.
    Barnette PA
    Radiol Technol; 1972 May; 43(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 4670968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Jerman Memorial Lecture. Computer reconstruction of radiographic images.
    Gurley LT
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 51(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 7355194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography.
    Timothy PS
    Radiography; 1973 Dec; 39(468):330-3. PubMed ID: 4772504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A practical technique for baseline mammography.
    Gurley LT; Harwood SW
    Radiol Technol; 1972; 44(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 4636568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Significance of mammography and xeroradiography in the early diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Lutterbeck EF
    Zentralbl Chir; 1972 Jun; 97(22):713-9. PubMed ID: 4341038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No one is immune from breast cancer.
    Reitherman RW
    Radiol Technol; 1991; 63(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 1961934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review.
    van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):971-6. PubMed ID: 1450833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Mammography. Technic, symptomatology and clinical significance].
    Hoeffken W
    Chirurg; 1968 Jun; 39(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 5748705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determinants of quality in mammography.
    Bassett LW
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):213-32. PubMed ID: 9115493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.