BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150904)

  • 1. Canadian test screens mammogram readers.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 10150904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meet high expectations for mammography with high-quality services.
    Linver M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Nov; 20(11):89-92, 97-8. PubMed ID: 10344867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RAD-AID Asha Jyoti Mammogram Quality Assessment in India: Optimizing Mobile Radiology.
    Mango VL; Ha R; Nguyen B; Mema E; Kobeski J; Singh T; Khandelwal N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):831-4. PubMed ID: 27162043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mammography 1994, Part I].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8312504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: "Author of Canadian breast cancer study retracts warnings".
    Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Sep; 84(17):1365-70. PubMed ID: 1495109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in mammography: College of Radiology Survey in Malaysia.
    Ho EL; Ng KH; Wong JH; Wang HB
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Jun; 61(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 16898312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control and artifacts in mammography.
    Newman J
    Radiol Technol; 1998; 70(1):61-76; quiz 77-80. PubMed ID: 9779510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian network for mammography.
    Burnside E; Rubin D; Shachter R
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():106-10. PubMed ID: 11079854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital imaging in the surgical detection of breast neoplasms].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Carli L; Cagini L
    G Chir; 1993 Dec; 14(9):483-7. PubMed ID: 8167081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
    Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality improvement projects for value-based care in breast imaging.
    Sippo DA; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1189-90. PubMed ID: 25307675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.
    Kanal KM; Krupinski E; Berns EA; Geiser WR; Karellas A; Mainiero MB; Martin MC; Patel SB; Rubin DL; Shepard JD; Siegel EL; Wolfman JA; Mian TA; Mahoney MC
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 22992865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Burhenne HJ
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):875-6; author reply 880-3. PubMed ID: 8448695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993.
    Clay MG; Hislop TG; Kan L; Olivotto IA; Burhenne LJ
    Am J Surg; 1994 May; 167(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 8185033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie.
    Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Case tracking and sharing system to foster consistent group standards of practice and improve radiologist experience in DBT.
    Hoagland LF; Alkasab TK; Freer PE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):910-2. PubMed ID: 25037109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A blurry picture. Mammography, though marred by controversy, is still the most valued tool for detecting breast cancer. But a continuing shortage of radiologists takes some luster off the gold standard.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Dec; 32(48):28-33. PubMed ID: 12510629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ACR system enhances mammography reporting.
    Kopans D; D'Orsi C
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):125-32. PubMed ID: 10183943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.