94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10150913)
21. Density gradient separation of hematopoietic stem cells in autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Iacone A; Quaglietta AM; D'Antonio D; Accorsi P; Dragani A; Angrilli F; Berardi A; Angelini A; Di Bartolomeo P; Di Bartolomeo G
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():18-21. PubMed ID: 1677910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ABO-mismatched marrow processing for transplantation: results of 114 procedures and analysis of immediate adverse events and hematopoietic recovery.
Larghero J; Rea D; Esperou H; Biscay N; Maurer MN; Lacassagne MN; Ternaux B; Traineau R; Yakouben K; Dosquet C; Socié G; Gluckman E; Benbunan M; Marolleau JP
Transfusion; 2006 Mar; 46(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 16533282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recovery of CFU-GM from cryopreserved marrow and in vivo evaluation after autologous bone marrow transplantation are predictive of engraftment.
Douay L; Gorin NC; Mary JY; Lemarie E; Lopez M; Najman A; Stachowiak J; Giarratana MC; Baillou C; Salmon C
Exp Hematol; 1986 Jun; 14(5):358-65. PubMed ID: 3519263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immunomagnetic purging of breast cancer from bone marrow for autologous transplantation.
Shpall EJ; Bast RC; Joines WT; Jones RB; Anderson I; Johnston C; Eggleston S; Tepperberg M; Edwards S; Peters WP
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Feb; 7(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 2049558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ABO-incompatible pediatric bone marrow transplantation: a simple method to remove red blood cells from small volume marrow grafts.
Chan KW; Herd SL; Stanley CE; Wadsworth LD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Dec; 8(6):473-6. PubMed ID: 1790427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive value of the original content of CD34(+) cells for enrichment of hematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow harvests by the apheresis procedure.
Itoh T; Minegishi M; Kudo Y; Saito N; Takahashi H; Suzuki A; Narita A; Sato Y; Miura J; Inoue Y; Kameoka J; Suwabe N; Imaizumi M; Okuda M; Tsuchiya S
J Clin Apher; 2006 Oct; 21(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 16619225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison between two different procedures for bone marrow processing: a semiautomated procedure vs manual starch sedimentation.
Menichella G; Pierelli L; Serafini R; Foddai ML; Vittori M; Paoloni A; De Martini M; Rossi PL; Mango G; Bizzi B
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():12-4. PubMed ID: 1713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated isolation of mononuclear cells using the Fenwal CS3000 blood cell separator.
Areman EM; Cullis H; Sacher RA; Cottler-Fox M; Deeg HJ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():379-85. PubMed ID: 2308992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differential sensitivity of adherent CFU-blast, CFU-mix, BFU-E, and CFU-GM to mafosfamide: implications for adjusted dose purging in autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Carlo-Stella C; Mangoni L; Almici C; Garau D; Craviotto L; Piovani G; Caramatti C; Rizzoli V
Exp Hematol; 1992 Mar; 20(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 1568448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease by lymphocyte depletion of the bone marrow graft with use of counterflow centrifugation.
Haanen C; De Witte T; Plas A; Schattemberg T
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():22-8. PubMed ID: 1864551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A fully automated method for mononuclear bone marrow cell concentration.
Rodriguez JM; Carmona M; Noguerol P; Ruiz M; Parody R; Vidal F; Perez-Hurtado JM; Espigado I
J Clin Apher; 1992; 7(3):101-9. PubMed ID: 1286988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of progenitor cell concentration techniques: continuous flow separation versus density-gradient isolation.
Davis JM; Schepers KG; Eby LL; Noga SJ
J Hematother; 1993; 2(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 7921992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rapid and safe automated processing of bone marrow grafts without using density gradient cryopreservation and transplantation.
Deméocq F; Kanold J; Bezou MJ; Travade P; Chassagne J; Berger M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():675-84. PubMed ID: 7700935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A new multichamber counterflow centrifugation rotor with high-separation capacity and versatile potentials.
Plas A; de Witte T; Wessels H; Haanen C
Exp Hematol; 1988 Jun; 16(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 3286279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Elimination of red blood cells from marrow suspension prior to transplantation using polysaccharide-ditrizoate gradient centrifugation. Experimental studies.
Ratajczak MZ; Szczylik C; Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W
Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1989; 116(3-4):469-73. PubMed ID: 2480292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A method for clinical purging of myeloma bone marrow using peanut agglutinin as an anti-plasma cell agent, in combination with CD19 monoclonal antibody.
Rhodes EG; Baker PK; Duguid JK; Davies JM; Cawley JC
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 Dec; 10(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 1490198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mononuclear cell (MNC) concentration from the marrow harvest by automatic system.
Franchini E; Porlezza M
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():15-7. PubMed ID: 1864550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Separation of pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells from spleen colony-forming cells.
Jones RJ; Wagner JE; Celano P; Zicha MS; Sharkis SJ
Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6289):188-9. PubMed ID: 2395470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Purging leukemia remission marrows with alkyl-lysophospholipids, preclinical and clinical results.
Vogler WR; Olson AC; Berdel WE; Okamoto S; Glasser L
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():1-18; discussion 19-20. PubMed ID: 2308973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stem cells from peripheral blood and bone marrow: a comparative evaluation of the hemopoietic potential in the dog.
Raghavachar A; Prümmer O; Fliedner TM; Calvo W; Steinbach IB
Int J Cell Cloning; 1983 Sep; 1(4):191-205. PubMed ID: 6366082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
