These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10151683)
1. Two views of managed care's quality. Manag Care; 1995 Sep; 4(9):60. PubMed ID: 10151683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. By the numbers. Quality and satisfaction in Medicaid managed care. Treanor K Healthplan; 1999; 40(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10557741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Managed care and the under-privileged in the United States]. Simonet D Cah Sociol Demogr Med; 2002; 42(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 12050942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care. Harrington C; Weinberg J; Merrill S; Newman J Am J Med Qual; 2000; 15(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 11126593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating quality of care in fee-for-service and managed care delivery systems: recommendations for quality leaders. Kelly JT; Kelly JM Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1995 Apr; 7(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 10142331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health plan satisfaction directly related to health plan choices. Manag Care Interface; 1998 Dec; 11(12):81, 92. PubMed ID: 10338747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Choice matters: enrollees' views of their health plans. Davis K; Collins KS; Schoen C; Morris C Health Aff (Millwood); 1995; 14(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 7657265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managed care outlook. PPOs: time for a reality check. Manag Care; 1999 Jul; 8(7):58. PubMed ID: 10558086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Boost satisfaction rates by focusing on chronically ill. Capitation Rates Data; 2001 Dec; 6(12):143-4. PubMed ID: 11793871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Do increases in the market share of managed care influence quality of cancer care in the fee-for-service sector? Keating NL; Landrum MB; Meara E; Ganz PA; Guadagnoli E J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 15713960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What information do consumers want and how will they use it? Ware JE Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS25-30. PubMed ID: 7823654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managed care's EDI challenge. Burke M Health Data Manag; 1994 Apr; 2(3):22-4. PubMed ID: 10141180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In California, Medi-Cal managed care is superior to Medi-Cal fee-for-service. Bruno R; Gilbert BP Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(4):7-14. PubMed ID: 10185780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data quality under capitation in managed care. Spoeri RK J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 May; 14(4):34-5. PubMed ID: 10158188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction. They're happier with indemnity care? Says who? Rose JR Med Econ; 1998 Sep; 75(18):32. PubMed ID: 10185528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. By the numbers. Examining the appropriateness of care. Stanton M Healthplan; 1999; 40(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 10537464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commensurate ratings of health care. Bechtel GG J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):635-66. PubMed ID: 11253901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Member satisfaction surveys: the next frontier. Genovich-Richards J Manag Care Q; 1995; 3(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10151589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harris Poll shows most people like their health plans, if not managed care in general. Health Care Strateg Manage; 2002 Feb; 20(2):8. PubMed ID: 11877947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]