116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10151780)
1. Some IDSs, PHOs should follow insurance regs, NAIC recommends.
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Sep; 12(18):5-6. PubMed ID: 10151780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating payer and provider risk through capitation.
Barth SM
Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10164645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Storm warning. Insurance regulation.
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(5):26-9, 32-7. PubMed ID: 10152467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limits placed on PHOs by antitrust rulings, transitional structure for integration.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1995 Nov; 13(11):14-5. PubMed ID: 10151858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antitrust and the developing continuum: advice for administrators, managers, and providers.
Garrison P
Continuum; 1998; 18(1):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 10178903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. California debate brewing over full risk capitation contracts.
Pulley M
Integr Healthc Rep; 1994 Jan; ():14-5. PubMed ID: 10132216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State insurance regulation of provider-sponsored organizations.
Kelly MP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Jul; 51(7):44-6. PubMed ID: 10168437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishing risk-sharing mechanisms.
Clark CS
Healthc Financ Manage; 1996 Apr; 50(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 10156593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case for integrated delivery systems.
Guttler SD
N Engl J Med; 2010 Jan; 362(1):86; author reply 86. PubMed ID: 20054055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reasons providers form PHOs.
Abbey FB; Treash KM
Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Aug; 49(8):38-40, 42, 44 passim. PubMed ID: 10144172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Checkmate. Docs are pawns in game of creating integrated systems.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1997 Mar; 27(9):74, 76, 78-80. PubMed ID: 10165075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A primer on PHO capitation contracts.
Hillman DC
J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):288-306. PubMed ID: 10164236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Life after PHOs: MSOs take center stage.
Goldstein D
Med Interface; 1995 Sep; 8(9):59-65. PubMed ID: 10151604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ohio weighs rules for risk bearers.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1996 Apr; 26(16):26. PubMed ID: 10156896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EDI helps IPAs, PHOs manage risk.
Hand SM
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Feb; 53(2):78-9, 81. PubMed ID: 10345623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration options.
Williams L
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):88-96, 106. PubMed ID: 10160177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Resolving conflicting laws and policy in integrated delivery systems development.
Shaffer AD; Pavarini PA
J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):85-120. PubMed ID: 10182031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-sharing PHOs escaping state regulators' scrutiny, study says.
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Aug; 12(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10152380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. IRS views on physician control of integrated networks.
Griffith GM
Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Nov; 49(11):30-2, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 10151865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Special report: Antitrust and health care. Anticipating antitrust pitfalls in new health care ventures.
Brett BJ; Porter KD; Rinehart SG
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Feb; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 10158210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
