BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10151839)

  • 1. Getting SMART (submission management and review tracking) drug review in the computer age.
    Flieger K
    FDA Consum; 1995 Oct; 29(8):6-9. PubMed ID: 10151839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The drive to reform the FDA gains momentum.
    Gatty B
    Hosp Formul; 1995 Mar; 30(3):178, 177. PubMed ID: 10141250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA and EMEA pool scientific advice.
    Katsnelson A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1490-1. PubMed ID: 15583642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on electronic common technical document specification; availability. Notice.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2003 Apr; 68(63):16060-1. PubMed ID: 12674113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BIO and biogenerics.
    Feldbaum CB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):17; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 15637607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What ails the FDA?
    Jenny-Avital ER
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(24):2554-5. PubMed ID: 15962407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDA embraces risk-management approach.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1120-1. PubMed ID: 14520383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biogenerics standoff.
    Herrera S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1343-6. PubMed ID: 15529145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical tipping point.
    Zuckerman MB
    US News World Rep; 2002 Apr; 132(13):72. PubMed ID: 11993366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who would approve new drugs if there were no FDA?
    Gatty B
    Hosp Formul; 1995 Jan; 30(1):58, 57. PubMed ID: 10139726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug information resources for health professionals and consumers.
    Durkin C
    Natl Netw; 1998 Feb; 22(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 10176590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug and vaccine development for infectious diseases: the value of priority review vouchers.
    Matheny J; Smith B; Courtney B; Mair M
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Jun; 85(6):571-2. PubMed ID: 19451907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Muddied messages about FDA.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):732-3. PubMed ID: 12833084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Requirements for submission of labeling for human prescription drugs and biologics in electronic format. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2003 Dec; 68(238):69009-20. PubMed ID: 14672084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steve Carney talks to Vincent Lee on the pharma industry, the FDA and public education with respect to drugs and their development.
    Lee VH
    Drug Discov Today; 2005 Nov; 10(21):1411-4. PubMed ID: 16243258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preparing for an FDA preapproval inspection.
    Blackmer RA
    Qual Assur; 1994 Dec; 3(4):389-403. PubMed ID: 7613749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FDA reorganization inspires hope for better coordination.
    May M
    Nat Med; 2011 Sep; 17(9):1024. PubMed ID: 21900900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The big gap at the FDA.
    Stipp D
    Fortune; 2002 Jul; 146(2):113-4, 116. PubMed ID: 12141178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priority review vouchers: an inefficient and dangerous way to promote neglected-disease drug development.
    Kesselheim AS
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Jun; 85(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 19451908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FDA not NIH can speed new drugs.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7342):169. PubMed ID: 21490657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.