91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10151964)
1. A cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening: health policy implications.
Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
Health Policy; 1995 Oct; 34(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 10151964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Costs and effects of alternative screening programs against cervical cancer].
Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Aug; 158(35):4912-5. PubMed ID: 8801698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.
Fahs MC; Plichta SB; Mandelblatt JS
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Mar; 9(3):211-30. PubMed ID: 10160098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of shortening screening interval or extending age range of NHS breast screening programme: computer simulation study.
Boer R; de Koning H; Threlfall A; Warmerdam P; Street A; Friedman E; Woodman C
BMJ; 1998 Aug; 317(7155):376-9. PubMed ID: 9694752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical cancer screening and follow-up programs.
Celentano DD; deLissovoy G
Public Health Rev; 1989-1990; 17(2-3):173-240. PubMed ID: 2518819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for the elderly.
Fahs MC; Mandelblatt J; Schechter C; Muller C
Ann Intern Med; 1992 Sep; 117(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 1503355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Health economics analysis of cervical cancer screening].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pál M; Sándor J; Ember I
Orv Hetil; 2003 Apr; 144(15):713-7. PubMed ID: 12774432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: comparison of screening policies.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Oortmarssen GJ; Boer R; Habbema JD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Feb; 94(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 11830609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer -- a global and regional generalized cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ginsberg GM; Edejer TT; Lauer JA; Sepulveda C
Vaccine; 2009 Oct; 27(43):6060-79. PubMed ID: 19647813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it cost effective to introduce screening programmes for colorectal cancer? Illustrating the principles of optimal resource allocation.
Gyrd-Hansen D
Health Policy; 1997 Sep; 41(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 10170088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Costs of population cervical cancer screening program in Poland between 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Kedzia W; Molińska-Glura M; Seroczyński P; Januszek-Michalecka L; Rokita W; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):750-6. PubMed ID: 21117303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range?
Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kim JJ; Campos NG; Sy S; Burger EA; Cuzick J; Castle PE; Hunt WC; Waxman A; Wheeler CM;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 163(8):589-97. PubMed ID: 26414147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?
De Koning HJ
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10674787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Self-Sampling to Improve Routine Cervical Cancer Screening: The Importance of Respondent Screening History and Compliance.
Burger EA; Sy S; Nygård M; Kim JJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Jan; 26(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 27624639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries.
Maxwell GL; Carlson JW; Ochoa M; Krivak T; Rose GS; Myers ER
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 100(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 12383543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
