These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Improving quality and resource utilization through the clinical technologist. Vatieri G; Gopaul D; Brown S; Hostetler P Can J Med Technol; 1995; 57(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 10141816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structuring CQI processes within the laboratory: a case study from microbiology. Ogram D Can J Med Technol; 1994; 56(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 10137667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality in pathology: of Deming, the Edsel, and Henry Ford. Renshaw AA Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):461-2. PubMed ID: 19289580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A unique approach for reducing specimen labeling errors: combining marketing techniques with performance improvement. Simpson JB Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 11822269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The missing link: quality in the identification and preanalytic phase]. Dhondt JL Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2001; 59(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 11282530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Launching quality improvement in histology. Shaw PA MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Mar; 25(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10124714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying the Australian Quality Awards criteria to a clinical chemistry department. Burnett L Qual Manag Health Care; 1994; 3(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10139244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Life after phlebotomy deployment: reducing major patient and specimen identification errors. Bologna LJ; Mutter M J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11813527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Take control of quality! MacInnes J Can J Med Technol; 1994; 56(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 10134672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Creating the environment for process improvement. Welborn AL; Collins JB Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(6):477-80, 482-9. PubMed ID: 10153279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of a Lean quality improvement implementation program on surgical pathology specimen accessioning and gross preparation error frequency. Smith ML; Wilkerson T; Grzybicki DM; Raab SS Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Sep; 138(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 22912352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of policies relating to clinical laboratory specimens. Ogram D Can J Med Technol; 1991; 53(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 10112876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A quality improvement cycle: hemolyzed specimens in the emergency department. Pretlow L; Gandy T; Leibach EK; Russell B; Kraj B Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 19174982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inpatient phlebotomy practices. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement study of 2,351,643 phlebotomy requests. Howanitz PJ; Schifman RB Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Jun; 118(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 8204004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing turnaround time for ABGs in the ICCU. Schiller L; Tiffany D MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 10131766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]