These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10152138)
1. HCFA makes concession on 'Stark I' exemptions. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):48. PubMed ID: 10152138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules. Portman RM; Lisa GC Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FAHS refers Stark II reactions to HCFA. Gogal L Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):4. PubMed ID: 10185365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships. Avery PA; Wachler AB Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA needs to shine some light through Stark II's murkiness on 'gifts'. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 7(11):56-7. PubMed ID: 10187130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HCFA implementation of Stark II law examines motive in payment review. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Aug; 7(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 10182585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Phase I of the Stark II final rule. Wachler AB; Avery PA Mich Health Hosp; 2001; 37(4):52-3. PubMed ID: 11467128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stark II makes it easier to terminate bad contracts. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Dec; 7(12):46-7. PubMed ID: 10344810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AHCA, Rep. Stark seek inclusion of SNFs, other entities in HCFA directive on post-hospital referrals. Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Mar; 6(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 10178932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New final Stark II regulations. Pontius CA MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II. Katayama AC WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician group practice implications under the proposed Stark II regulations. Sokolow DS Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Aug; ():6-9. PubMed ID: 10661984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are cardiac-catheterization services Stark designated health services? Becker S; Kannensohn K Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Aug; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10173889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience. Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stark self-referral rules burdened with complexities. Barratt K; Katayama A Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 8571621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]