These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR; Sheldon TA; Song F Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(19):1-276. PubMed ID: 10347832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials. Appel LJ Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some alternative perspectives concerning medical technology assessment. Diamond GA J Invasive Cardiol; 1992; 4(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10149903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the validity of clinical trials. Akobeng AK J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized trials or population-based registries. Bergqvist D; Björck M; Säwe J; Troëng T Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 17689818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods of assessing medical technology. Jonsson E World Hosp; 1987 Oct; 23(3-4):29-33. PubMed ID: 10302123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy. Huang L J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can non-randomized trials be considered to be equivalent to randomized trials in forensic mental health? Leese M Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 16470506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FDA perspective on clinical trial design for cardiovascular devices. Chen E; Sapirstein W; Ahn C; Swain J; Zuckerman B Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):773-5. PubMed ID: 16928481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials. Morris T J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis. Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F; Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The delayed-start study in Parkinson disease: can't satisfy everyone. Olanow CW; Rascol O Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1149-50. PubMed ID: 20368635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Jumping in before the water is hot: the need to support randomized controlled clinical trials. Epstein AE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):867-9. PubMed ID: 15333076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reliability of controlled clinical trials--the problem of randomization]. Gøtzsche PC Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 Jan; 157(5):597-8. PubMed ID: 7638918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Strengthening the case for disease management effectiveness: un-hiding the hidden bias. Linden A; Adams JL; Roberts N J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 16579822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]