157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10152425)
1. Networks need not build a physician comp program entirely from scratch.
Hardy T
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1995 Jan; 4(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10152425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How to maximize doctors' productivity and profitability in the shift to capitation.
Hunter A
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1995 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 10153458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tying physician incentive pay to performance.
Bledsoe DR; Leisy WB; Rodeghero JA
Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Dec; 49(12):40-4. PubMed ID: 10152894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Give me back managed care.' Part 1.
Irvin JD
Manag Care; 1995 Dec; 4(12):31-2, 34. PubMed ID: 10153808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Matching physician compensation plans to capitation levels.
Kennedy KM; Buckley MP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Sep; 51(9):81-3, 85. PubMed ID: 10170324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equal shares or productivity? How doctors divide income.
Terry K
Med Econ; 1998 Oct; 75(19):114-6, 119-24. PubMed ID: 10185532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The best ways to divide income.
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1996 Aug; 73(16):74-6, 81-2, 87-8 passim. PubMed ID: 10159696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Compensating physicians in a mixed fee-for-service/capitated practice.
Erra RJ
Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1994 Mar; 6(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 10133042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. More, not less, managed care may be the key to higher physician income.
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1998 Jun; 7(6):8-11. PubMed ID: 10180639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transition to capitation. Aligning incentives for success.
Koeppen L; Mess MA; Trott KJ; Yazvac LS
Physician Exec; 1997 Jan; 23(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10164283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of capitated and fee-for-service remuneration on physician decision making in gynecology.
Redwine DB
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):482. PubMed ID: 8752263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The primary care group model.
Gastright JA
J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 Oct; 83(10):569-72. PubMed ID: 7989892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How payment systems affect physicians' provision behaviour--an experimental investigation.
Hennig-Schmidt H; Selten R; Wiesen D
J Health Econ; 2011 Jul; 30(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 21683460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Customize physician incentive programs to fit the individual doctor's needs.
Koster JF; Smithson KW
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1996 May; 5(5):4-7. PubMed ID: 10156977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Income division for the 1990s: advanced ideas on productivity and salary.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1995 Mar; 4(3):45-6. PubMed ID: 10142060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing the mixed physician practice.
Holt MW
Physician Exec; 1989; 15(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 10312887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stop me before I kill again.
Friedman E
Healthc Forum J; 1998; 41(6):8, 10-2. PubMed ID: 10346621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Payment arrangements and financial incentives for physicians.
Lake TK; St Peter RF
Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change); 1997; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12577951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How and how much should physicians be paid?
La Puma J
Manag Care; 1996 Aug; 5(8):51-2. PubMed ID: 10160144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician compensation: approach and models in neurological practice.
Sigsbee B
Neurol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):339-48. PubMed ID: 20202496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
