122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10152775)
1. What do payors & providers see as their most important I.S. requirements?
Bradley J; Power A; Smith E
Infocare; 1995; ():18-20. PubMed ID: 10152775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic records: better service for customers & payors.
Leavitt M
Infocare; 1995 Feb; ():14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10140637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Back to the drawing board.
Siwicki B
Health Data Manag; 1997 Apr; 5(4):38, 41, 43. PubMed ID: 10166636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care fraud: a critical challenge.
Leonardo JA
Manag Care Q; 1996; 4(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 10154068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EDI streamlines reporting requirements for Medicare managed care.
Hand SM
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Jan; 53(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 10339167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Managed care. Beam me up, Scotty.
McFarland S
Health Manag Technol; 1999 Jun; 20(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10538043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retooling for managed care: one size does not fit all!
Wright K; Powell L
Caring; 2008 Jan; 27(1):14-6, 1. PubMed ID: 18309807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The electronic data interchange: avoiding potholes to add value & power for payors & providers.
Bigley J
Infocare; 1995 Aug; ():34-7. PubMed ID: 10145009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking on risk.
Bazzoli F
Health Data Manag; 1996 May; 4(5):36-50. PubMed ID: 10157337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Managed care and the information systems challenge.
Savoie T
Med Interface; 1995 Oct; 8(10):86-8. PubMed ID: 10152331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Standards. Trading clinical data.
St George J
Health Data Manag; 1995 Apr; 3(4):59-60. PubMed ID: 10154571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the difference between IS needs for fee-for-service & managed care organizations?
Vandergriff S; Johnson B; Skinner R; Palazzolo F; Claudio C
Infocare; 1995 Aug; ():20-2. PubMed ID: 10145007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Making the case for electronic records.
Amatayakul M
Health Data Manag; 1997 May; 5(5):56-7, 59, 61-3. PubMed ID: 10167250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Meeting the challenges of managed care.
Golembesky H
Integr Healthc Rep; 1998 Mar; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 10180266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cap still the foundation for emerging payment models.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Jun; 9(6):81-6. PubMed ID: 12154556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovators 1996. Leading the way.
Bazzoli F
Health Data Manag; 1996 Jul; 4(7):23-5, 28-31, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10158623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reimbursement issues: 4 steps to managed care.
Johnson MD; Morrison M
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Apr; 13(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 10156429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrestling with the managed care octopus, Part 4. Get plans to pay in full, on time.
Larkin H
Med Econ; 1999 Jun; 76(11):79-82, 87-8, 90. PubMed ID: 10537728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Building integrated systems--medical informatics.
Ruffin M
Healthc Forum J; 1993; 36(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 10124169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health plan payments to noncontracted providers.
Doherty JF
Manag Care Interface; 2005 Jul; 18(7):49-51, 61. PubMed ID: 16060487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
