190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10153427)
1. Reliability of data of the Thames cancer registry on 673 cases of colorectal cancer: effect of the registration process.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 10153427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing DCO registrations through electronic matching of cancer registry data and routine hospital data.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 2000 Feb; 82(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 10682687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incompleteness and retrieval of case notes in a case note audit of colorectal cancer.
Vickers N; Pollock A
Qual Health Care; 1993 Sep; 2(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10131461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of colorectal cancer in three South Thames District Health Authorities.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Public Health; 1997 May; 111(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 9175461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Registration of colorectal cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records.
Brewster D; Muir C; Crichton J
Public Health; 1995 Jul; 109(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 7667493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a specialist haematological malignancy database against a regional cancer registry: case ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy.
Phekoo K; Møller H; Richards M; Schey S
Br J Haematol; 2002 Dec; 119(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 12437646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of cancer registration data in Scotland, 1997.
Brewster DH; Stockton D; Harvey J; Mackay M
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Feb; 38(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 11818208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concordance on the recording of cancer in the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency Registry, hospital charts and death registrations.
Rawson NS; Robson DL
Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 11089296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal cancer registration: the central importance of pathology.
Manser MD; Levine DF; Pheby DF; Pitcher RW
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):875-7. PubMed ID: 11127275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data quality in population-based cancer registration: an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry.
Seddon DJ; Williams EM
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 9303369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Completeness of case ascertainment in a Scottish regional cancer registry for the year 1992.
Brewster DH; Crichton J; Harvey JC; Dawson G
Public Health; 1997 Sep; 111(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 9308385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the Kuwait Cancer Registry: a comparison between breast cancer data collected by clinical oncologists and registry staff.
Elbasmi AA; Fayaz MS; Al-Mohanadi S; Al-Nesf Y; Al-Awadi A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(3):735-8. PubMed ID: 21039045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice?
Field K; Kosmider S; Johns J; Farrugia H; Hastie I; Croxford M; Chapman M; Harold M; Murigu N; Gibbs P
Intern Med J; 2010 Aug; 40(8):566-73. PubMed ID: 19460066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [State of health of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany].
Minichilli F; Nuvolone D; Bustaffa E; Cipriani F; Vigotti MA; Bianchi F
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 23139155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of district of residence and known primary site for bowel cancer survival: analysis of data from Wessex Cancer Registry.
Pickering RM; Chadwell IR; Mountney L
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Jun; 46(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 1645084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
