These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10153898)

  • 1. Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks.
    Keen J; Bryan S; Muris N; Weatherburn G; Buxton M
    Health Policy; 1995 Dec; 34(3):153-66. PubMed ID: 10153898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S; Keen J; Muris N; Weatherburn G; Buxton M
    Health Policy; 1995 Jul; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10143699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Becker SH; Arenson RL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1994; 1(5):361-71. PubMed ID: 7850560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system.
    Bryan S; Weatherburn G; Buxton M; Watkins J; Keen J; Muris N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1999 Oct; 4(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 10623035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using technology assessment as the picture archiving and communication system spreads outside radiology to the enterprise.
    Maliff RP; Launders J
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):114-6. PubMed ID: 10847377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Economic and organizational evaluation of an imaging network (PACS)].
    Charvet-Protat S; Thoral F
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1453-9. PubMed ID: 9921447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparing a business justification for going electronic.
    Ortiz AO; Luyckx MP
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 11857990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the impact of a diffuse technology on the running costs of a hospital. A case study of a picture archiving and communication system.
    Bryan S; Buxton M; Brenna E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(3):787-98. PubMed ID: 11028134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial data-element selection for the evaluation of picture archiving and communication system performance.
    Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 7858013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technology assessment methods for radiology systems.
    Langlotz CP; Seshadri S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 May; 34(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 8657877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Langlotz CP; Even-Shoshan O; Seshadri SS; Brikman I; Kishore S; Kundel HL; Schwartz JS
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 May; 8(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 7612707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The DICOM standard in computer-assisted medical technologies].
    Plotnikov AV; Prilutskiĭ DA; Selishchev SV
    Med Tekh; 1997; (2):18-24. PubMed ID: 9213734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital image communication.
    Meyer-Ebrecht D
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Jun; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8348913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Picture archiving and communication in radiology.
    Napoli M; Nanni M; Cimarra S; Crisafulli L; Campioni P; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 14509181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Picture archiving and communication systems.
    Health Devices; 2004 Aug; 33(8):265-90. PubMed ID: 15453076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview of some methodological problems in assessment of PACS.
    Crowe BL
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1992 May; 30(3-4):181-6. PubMed ID: 1634261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective.
    Strickland NH
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Dec; 69(828):1089-98. PubMed ID: 9135462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. User requirements and standards for PACS. 2nd Japan-Nordic PACS Symposium.
    Saranummi N; Akisada M; Irie G; Kiuru A; Mattheus R; Okabe T; Olsson S; Viitanen J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 May; 37(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 1356706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gradual PACS adoption.
    Peterson GV
    Radiol Manage; 1995; 17(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 10144828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The research and implementation of DICOM interface of medical imaging devices].
    Li X; Li L; Tong B; Xing H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):752-5. PubMed ID: 17899737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.