These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10156292)

  • 1. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.
    Lovitky JA
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues.
    Tapay N
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10116425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
    van Geertruyden YH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Practitioner Data Bank Guidebook Supplement.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10124485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986].
    Cruz ML
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: reporting on adverse and negative actions. Final rule.
    Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2010 Jan; 75(18):4655-82. PubMed ID: 20352662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.
    Heffernan M
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Apr; 84(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8826636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
    Purtell DL
    Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operation of the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Rothschild IS
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Aug; 25(8):225-31, 241. PubMed ID: 10123438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians.
    Gagliano RD; Butler DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10114111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.