BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10156292)

  • 1. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.
    Lovitky JA
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues.
    Tapay N
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10116425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
    van Geertruyden YH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Practitioner Data Bank Guidebook Supplement.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10124485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986].
    Cruz ML
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: reporting on adverse and negative actions. Final rule.
    Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2010 Jan; 75(18):4655-82. PubMed ID: 20352662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.
    Heffernan M
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Apr; 84(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8826636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
    Purtell DL
    Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operation of the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Rothschild IS
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Aug; 25(8):225-31, 241. PubMed ID: 10123438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians.
    Gagliano RD; Butler DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10114111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.