These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10156391)

  • 41. Clinical audit and the purchaser-provider interaction: different attitudes and expectations in the United Kingdom.
    Thomson R; Elcoat C; Pugh E
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10158598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An audit of 319 deaths across four general practices.
    Holden J; Brindley J; O'Donnell S; Miles L
    Br J Clin Pract; 1996 Mar; 50(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 8731643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Audit Commission review of diabetes services in England and Wales, 1998-2001.
    Fitzsimons B; Wilton L; Lamont T; McCulloch L; Boyce J
    Diabet Med; 2002 Jul; 19 Suppl 4():73-8. PubMed ID: 12121342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of medical audit advisory groups.
    Richards C
    BMJ; 1991 Jan; 302(6769):153-5. PubMed ID: 1995136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.
    Campbell SM; Hann M; Hacker J; Durie A; Thapar A; Roland MO
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Jun; 11(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 12448803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.
    Grol R; Wensing M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):548-52. PubMed ID: 7492425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Registrars' and senior registrars' perceptions of their audit activities.
    Firth-Cozens J; Storer D
    Qual Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 10136856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Where have all the pennies gone? The work of Manchester Medical Audit Advisory Group.
    Johnson R
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6947):98-102. PubMed ID: 8038680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Factors influencing audit in general practice.
    Davies C; Fletcher J; Szczepura A; Wilmot J
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1996; 9(5):5-9. PubMed ID: 10162123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What did audit achieve? Lessons from preliminary evaluation of a year's medical audit.
    Gabbay J; McNicol MC; Spiby J; Davies SC; Layton AJ
    BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6751):526-9. PubMed ID: 2207423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Supporting practice-based audit: a price to be paid for collecting data.
    Lough JR; Willmot M; Murray TS
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Oct; 49(447):793-5. PubMed ID: 10885082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Randomised controlled trial of reminders to enhance the impact of audit in general practice on management of patients who use benzodiazepines.
    Baker R; Farooqi A; Tait C; Walsh S
    Qual Health Care; 1997 Mar; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10166596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Medical audit in general practice. II: Effects on health of patients with common childhood conditions. North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice.
    BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6840):1484-8. PubMed ID: 1611373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario.
    Swanson G; Kaczorowski J
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1436-7, 1437.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18854475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Information systems for general practitioners for quality assessment: I. Responses of the doctors.
    Fraser RC; Gosling JT
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Nov; 291(6507):1473-6. PubMed ID: 3933715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Links between clinical audit and contracting systems.
    Lord J; Littlejohns P
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1995; 8(3):15-24. PubMed ID: 10143993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.
    Taylor A; Neuburger J; Walker K; Cromwell D; Groene O
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2016 Apr; 21(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 26811374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A survey of diabetes care in general practice in England and Wales.
    Pierce M; Agarwal G; Ridout D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jul; 50(456):542-5. PubMed ID: 10954934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems.
    Hansen DG; Munck AP; Kragstrup J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2002 Jun; 20(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 12184715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Medical audit advisory groups. Consider the number of practices.
    Howitt AJ; Varns C
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):811. PubMed ID: 7950594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.