105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10157713)
21. Commercial health insurance enrollment.
Seward WF
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Aug; 83(8):15-7. PubMed ID: 10185058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Preference regression modeling of multiple option healthcare delivery systems.
Jarboe GR; McDaniel CD; Gates RH
J Ambul Care Mark; 1992; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 10122757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient self-selection in HMOs.
Wilensky GR; Rossiter LF
Health Aff (Millwood); 1986; 5(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 3519408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Weighing your health plan choices.
Consum Rep; 2005 Sep; 70(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 16138449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Physical health, depressive symptoms, and managed care enrollment.
Druss BG; Allen HM; Bruce ML
Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Jul; 155(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 9659850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reflections on biased selection and future directions.
Ginsburg PB
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():275-80. PubMed ID: 10280624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Are "choice plans" too good to be true?
Frabotta J
Bus Health; 1989 May; 7(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 10293142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Employee responses to health insurance premium increases.
Goldman DP; Leibowitz AA; Robalino DA
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Jan; 10(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 14738186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Persistence of health care expense in an insured working population.
Goodman MJ; Roblin DW; Hornbrook MC; Mullooly JP
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():149-73. PubMed ID: 10122800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Does competition by health maintenance organizations affect the adoption of cost-containment measures by fee-for-service plans?
Joesch JM; Wickizer TM; Feldstein PJ
Am J Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 4(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 10181069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Data watch. Key features of employee health benefits plans.
Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Jun; 67(11):66. PubMed ID: 8499970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. California HMO enrollment falls below 50%--now what?
Capitation Rates Data; 2002 Apr; 7(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 11974385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Perspectives. Regression to the mean: PPOs, risk-sharing are market mainstays.
Clemmitt M
Med Health; 2000 Mar; 54(13):supppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 11009768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Health care consumers: choices and constraints.
McLaughlin CG
Med Care Res Rev; 1999; 56 Suppl 1():24-59; discussion 60-6. PubMed ID: 10354678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health plan satisfaction and risk of disenrollment among social/HMO and fee-for-service recipients.
Newcomer R; Preston S; Harrington C
Inquiry; 1996; 33(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 8675278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Indemnity insurance: down but not out.
Meyer H
Bus Health; 1996 May; 14(5):31-6. PubMed ID: 10157915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Corporate America is looking beyond health plans to develop benchmarks for medical groups. Here's what GM has in mind.
Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Jun; 11(6):5-7. PubMed ID: 10181499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.
Florence CS; Atherly A; Thorpe KE
Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 41(5):1741-61. PubMed ID: 16987300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A closer look at the managed care backlash.
Cooper PF; Simon KI; Vistnes J
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5 Suppl):I4-11. PubMed ID: 16625063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Health care reform in the states. California--edgy at the cutting edge.
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1995 Jul; 13(7):36-8, 40-3. PubMed ID: 10164765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
