161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10157781)
1. New survey process rocks Michigan facility.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1996 May; 19(5):67-8. PubMed ID: 10157781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HCFA's new survey protocols: the honeymoon may soon be over.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10558111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA to use quality indicators as survey tool under new protocol.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 May; 7(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 10538073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HCFA gives progress report on oversight, enforcement of nursing facilities; 100 homes targeted.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Oct; 6(20):1-2. PubMed ID: 10185937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HCFA enforcement changes irk providers and consumers alike.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Apr; 4(9):6, 8. PubMed ID: 10157762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes and dangers: managing survey risk within a PPS environment.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(15):6-7. PubMed ID: 10558112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Update: the new long-term care survey process.
Balcerzak SJ
J Long Term Care Adm; 1985; 13(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 10300611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New survey process expands sanctions. HCFA proposes more enforcement remedies and broader disclosure requirements for nursing facilities.
Grimaldi PL
Health Prog; 1992 Nov; 73(9):52-5. PubMed ID: 10122080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IOM study: the beat goes on in the name of quality.
Trocchio J
Provider; 1987 Jul; 13(7):29-30. PubMed ID: 10301749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare and Medicaid programs long-term care survey--HCFA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(114):21550-8. PubMed ID: 10300856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA quality indicators may produce focus in survey process.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 May; 4(11):9. PubMed ID: 10158062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. No end in sight: government group calls for 'unrelenting vigilance' of nursing facilities through an even tougher survey process.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Oct; 8(20):4, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11188080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tension drops in second year of revised enforcement survey.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Jan; 5(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10164175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA not in favor of replacing survey and certification procedures.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Jun; 5(13):5-6. PubMed ID: 10168183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Five ideas on passing HCFA's new enforcement survey.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Jan; 4(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 10157748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality indicators--blessing or ???
Johnson L
Balance; 2000; 4(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11921757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HCFA overhauls negative enforcement survey policies.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Apr; 4(9):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10157761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CMS clarification of survey and certification interpretive guidelines.
Sollins HL
Geriatr Nurs; 2008; 29(2):92-3. PubMed ID: 18394508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Paying the piper: HCFA guidance on survey revisits raises concerns about continuation of penalties.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Oct; 8(21):3-4. PubMed ID: 11213763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HCFA's termination process.
Harris S
Provider; 1986 Jun; 12(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 10276961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
