These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10157893)

  • 1. Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement.
    Ng KG
    Intensive Care World; 1995 Sep; 12(3):89-102. PubMed ID: 10157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.
    Davis PD; Dennis JL; Railton R
    J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Mar; 19(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15565174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey of automated noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(6):452-75. PubMed ID: 10139740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of measurement methods and clinical validation studies of noninvasive blood pressure monitors: accuracy requirements and protocol considerations for devices that require patient-specific calibration by a secondary method or device before use.
    Ng KG
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Dec; 16(6):291-303. PubMed ID: 22064634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diurnal blood pressure. Practical, prognostic and therapeutic aspects].
    Christensen HR; Wiinberg N; Nielsen PE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Mar; 154(13):840-5. PubMed ID: 1553779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of noninvasive continuous finger arterial blood pressure measurements in very young children, aged 0-4 years.
    Andriessen P; Schraa O; van Den Bosch-Ruis W; Jan Ten Harkel D; Settels JJ; Oetomo SB; Blanco CE
    Pediatr Res; 2008 Jun; 63(6):691-6. PubMed ID: 18520333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients.
    Janelle GM; Gravenstein N
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 16428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failure to cycle noninvasive blood pressure cuff after anesthesia monitor upgrade.
    Wollenberg ML; Robinson ST
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Jan; 114(1):242-3. PubMed ID: 22184614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity and reliability of automated and manually measured toe blood pressure in ischemic legs of diabetic patients.
    Påhlsson HI; Lund K; Jörneskog G; Gush R; Wahlberg E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 36(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 18801666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
    Bur A; Herkner H; Vlcek M; Woisetschläger C; Derhaschnig U; Delle Karth G; Laggner AN; Hirschl MM
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Practical questions related to self-measurement of blood pressure].
    Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; de Leeuw PW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(10):546-9. PubMed ID: 18402319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct versus indirect measurement of blood pressure.
    Raftery EB
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1991 Dec; 9(8):S10-2. PubMed ID: 1795191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A continuous and non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring system in dialysis patients.
    Mambelli E; Mancini E; Santoro A
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2007; 107(4):c170-6. PubMed ID: 17975324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.