These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10158370)
1. Data rich, information poor (DRIP) syndrome: is there a treatment? Goodwin S Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10158370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data rich, information poor (DRIP) syndrome: is there a treatment? Goodwin S QRC Advis; 1995 Dec; 12(2):1-5, suppl 1 p.. PubMed ID: 10152856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Information management and quality improvement: the Joint Commission's perspective. Schyve PM; Kamowski DB Qual Manag Health Care; 1994; 2(4):54-62. PubMed ID: 10137608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updating a QA program to meet new JCAHO standards. Baker K Radiol Manage; 1992; 14(3):64-71. PubMed ID: 10120118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart. Benedetto AR Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing data for quality improvement. Darby M Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Jun; 10(6):2-9. PubMed ID: 10180629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. JCAHO's 'Agenda for Change' to place new demands on systems. Gardner E Mod Healthc; 1992 Jan; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 10115659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 joint commission standards. Donnelly LF J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 17903754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The competency question. Ruthemeyer M Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 11151318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical use of computerized hospital information systems to improve blood transfusion. Butch SH Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S50-6. PubMed ID: 9124230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance-based assessment of radiology faculty: a practical plan to promote improvement and meet JCAHO standards. Donnelly LF; Strife JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1398-401. PubMed ID: 15855086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data acquisition: the enigma of quality measurement. Spath PL Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Dec; 10(2):1-11. PubMed ID: 10296240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Taming the measurement monster. Spath PL Front Health Serv Manage; 2007; 23(4):3-14. PubMed ID: 17621923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient data critical to hospital-wide quality. Shapleigh C Healthc Financ Manage; 1991 Jun; 45(6):80, 82, 84 passim. PubMed ID: 10145450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital survey process changes in 2000. Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11009951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-specific standards in radiology. Prieto EI; Haresign P Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 10158368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The process of managerial control in quality improvement initiatives. Slovensky DJ; Fottler MD Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Nov; 15(2):37-48. PubMed ID: 10138526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simplistic approach to establishing drug usage/quality assurance programs. Adachi W Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 25(6):541-4, 546-50, 555-9. PubMed ID: 10104830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the Joint Commission's indicators for monitoring the medication use system. Schaff RL; Schumock GT; Nadzam DM Hosp Pharm; 1991 Apr; 26(4):326-9, 350. PubMed ID: 10110245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]