231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10158624)
1. New generation of lab systems offers more functions, connectivity.
Bunschoten B
Health Data Manag; 1996 Jul; 4(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 10158624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory systems evolve to meet data demands.
Bazzoli F
Health Data Manag; 1999 Nov; 7(11):66-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10662287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory information systems, Part 2. How well does LIS reach all 4 corners of the lab?
Jahn M
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Jan; 28(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 10154376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting to the point: integrating critical care tests in the patient care setting.
DuBois JA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Jun; 32(6):52-6. PubMed ID: 11066400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Point-of-care testing versus central lab costs.
Baer DM
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Sep; 30(9):46-8, 50-2, 54-6. PubMed ID: 10186317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ten technologies that promise efficiency in the clinical lab.
Vanderslice L; Winsten D
Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):52-4, 56, 58. PubMed ID: 10120842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Golden labs. Laboratories look to newer systems to streamline labor-intensive tasks, reduce payrolls and speed turnaround times.
Marietti C
Healthc Inform; 1998 Aug; 15(8):65-6, 68-76, 80. PubMed ID: 10182499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The virtual laboratory: regional clinical diagnostics for integrated delivery systems.
Steiner JW
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Nov; 51(11):40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 10174769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of a decision: one lab's move to a single testing platform.
Hohnadel DC
Cost Qual Q J; 1998 Oct; 4(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 10351381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Positioning the lab for managed care.
Roney L
Healthc Inform; 1995 Mar; 12(3):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10140939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. America's 10 most computer advanced laboratories.
Healthc Inform; 1996 Mar; 13(3):29-32, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 10155763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New technologies for laboratory productivity.
Lapekas P
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Mar; 12(3):30, 32, 34. PubMed ID: 10134603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Starts & stops: lab automation takes 15 years.
Smith A
Healthc Inform; 1993 Sep; 10(9):32, 34. PubMed ID: 10128252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the testers: how to choose and use a reference lab.
Bassoline B
Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jan; 22(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 10164230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sifting through the data to find the best LIS.
O'Brien JA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Jan; 33(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11211417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The lab manager's role in assessing new technology.
Lehmann CA; Leiken AM; Geidner R
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jan; 29(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 10164272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network support critical in choosing a lab system.
Watson S
Health Data Manag; 1995; 3(7):57-60, 63, 65. PubMed ID: 10143434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The instrument selection process: beyond the sales pitch.
Barglowski M
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Feb; 33(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 11236209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using analytical tools to make big decisions.
Roseman E
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Sep; 25(9):42-6. PubMed ID: 10128451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reading the future: the increased relevance of laboratory medicine in the next century.
Felder RA; Graves S; Mifflin T
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Jul; 31(7):20-1, 24-6. PubMed ID: 10539660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
