180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10158662)
21. Critics seek changes in nursing home survey.
Eubanks P
Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(3):68. PubMed ID: 2912864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Surviving the survey process ... or hiding behind it?
Bilyeu S
Contemp Longterm Care; 2001 Apr; 24(4):16-20, 22. PubMed ID: 11302054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Update: the new long-term care survey process.
Balcerzak SJ
J Long Term Care Adm; 1985; 13(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 10300611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Congress's watchful eye. Interview by Yvonne Parsons.
Grassley C
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Nov; 22(11):78. PubMed ID: 10662116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA ushers in new era of nursing home certification requirements.
Page LB
Healthspan; 1990 May; 7(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 10105171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Expect more unannounced surveys. The Joint Commission and HCFA increase the number of surprise visits.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Mar; 16(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11066609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Some reassurance on quality assurance privilege.
Infante MC
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Aug; 20(8):71. PubMed ID: 10170024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Survey, certification and enforcement procedures for nursing facilities.
Rife J; Chittick R; Freeman T
J Long Term Care Adm; 1996; 24(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 10164257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Drug utilization review in long-term care.
Sherman DS
Contemp Longterm Care; 1989 Aug; 12(10):79-81. PubMed ID: 10294592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. HCFA cleans up survey procedures.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Feb; 17(2):22. PubMed ID: 10134013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes measures are a necessity.
Jackson DL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Mar; 18(3):88. PubMed ID: 10141060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. HCFA proposes modifications to verification of compliance policy.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Mar; 9(6):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 11302012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Survey process gets a total makeover.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Feb; 18(2):21. PubMed ID: 10140129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. HCFA revises application process for new providers.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Jul; 5(14):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10170014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. OBRA. Pulling the pieces together.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Aug; 13(8):26-8, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10106832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality of care standard for medications.
Carley MM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Sep; 16(9):72, 74. PubMed ID: 10128354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. OSHA aims at nursing facilities; HCFA survey may provide targets.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Jul; 4(14):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10158639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey inconsistencies point to need for better training.
Johnson-Pawlson J
Provider; 1993 Jan; 19(1):60. PubMed ID: 10123207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Strategies to defend against quality of care allegations.
Senft DJ
Geriatr Nurs; 2008; 29(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 18694697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. HCFA: from the inside out.
Hash M
Health Prog; 2001; 82(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11508212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
