These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Laboratory financial management: a tool for analyzing productivity, cost-effectiveness, and utilization. Lepoff R; Champion P Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Jul; 14(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10144660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. As others see us, Part 3. The competitive marketplace: an exciting future for laboratory medicine. Coffman NB MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Aug; 30(8):52-4. PubMed ID: 10185546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement and control of performance in the laboratory. Ozan MT Hosp Prog; 1966 Apr; 47(4):68, 70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 15852573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reengineering the clinical laboratory. Transitioning to an open laboratory. Lehmann CA; Leiken AM MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Nov; 28(11):48, 52-3. PubMed ID: 10162664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Golden labs. Laboratories look to newer systems to streamline labor-intensive tasks, reduce payrolls and speed turnaround times. Marietti C Healthc Inform; 1998 Aug; 15(8):65-6, 68-76, 80. PubMed ID: 10182499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation. Part 1. Modular stepwise automation and the future of diagnostic testing. Felder RA; Kost GJ MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Apr; 30(4):22-4, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10178599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Satellite laboratories. A cost-benefit study. Kiechle FL; Aulakh V MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Nov; 30(11):44-5, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10339255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Doing more with less in the lab. Craig E MLO Med Lab Obs; 2003 Dec; 35(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 14699990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Drawing the plays with self-directed work teams. McArdle VB MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Nov; 30(11):16-8, 20, 22-5. PubMed ID: 10339254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing key laboratory performance indicators: a feasibility study. Potential roles for CLMA. Zinn J; Getzen T Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(3):178-98. PubMed ID: 10143165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing and using a balanced scorecard: a case study with SWOT analysis. Gumbus A; Lussier RN Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 12701559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The costs of quality: an interactive model of appraisal, prevention and failures. Broyles RW; al-Assaf AF Health Serv Manage Res; 1999 Aug; 12(3):169-82. PubMed ID: 10539405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How labs contribute to rising health care costs. Barros A MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Feb; 27(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 10140540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. As we see it. Making automation work. Barnes P; Bush E; Seidenfeld A; Santalab L; Ito RK Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1998; 12(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 10387153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Total quality management: an application in a biomedical laboratory. Latzer DB Hosp Cost Manag Account; 1997 May; 9(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10172989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical laboratory automation. Computerization can transform your lab from a drainer to a gainer. Terese SC; Edborg M Healthc Inform; 2005 Jun; 22(6):84-5. PubMed ID: 16011084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance standards based on quality, not quantity. Bailey MK MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Jul; 24(7):57-9. PubMed ID: 10120004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the quality of management decisions. Statland BE MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Oct; 26(10):24-8. PubMed ID: 10156305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]